Peer Reviewer Submission

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Thank you for agreeing to peer review a manuscript for BAPIO Publications. This form is in use for peer review for The Physician (2012) and Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinions (2007).

BAPIO Publications has an open, post-publication, peer-reviewing policy for all its submissions, since 2019. Your comments to the authors will be published alongside the final version of the article and will be citable with a DOI; any changes in the manuscript is published as revisions and published.

BAPIO Publications is currently a member of Crossref, DOI (10.38192) and is hosted on ScienceOpen collection as well as Google Scholar. It will be submitted for indexing by DOAJ, Web of Science and Pubmed Central. You can check the editorial board membership, editorial policy, previous editions and current issue on the websites; https://www.thephysician.uk
and https://www.sushruta.net

The journals are hosted online at
https://www.physicianjnl.net
https://www.sushrutajnl.net

For any queries please contact editor.thephysician@bapio.co.uk or editor.sushruta@bapio.co.uk

Published by BAPIO Publications for British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin since 1996.
The Physician ISSN 2732-513X (Print) ISSN 2732 - 5148 (Online)
Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinions ISSN 2732-5164 (Online) ISSN 2732-5156 (Print)

Email *

Please confirm the journal you are submitting your peer review for *

The Physician

Sushruta

Required

Please confirm your full name and qualifications *

Please confirm your institutional affiliation, experience or expertise in relation to the article to be reviewed *

Please confirm if you may have any conflict of interest or personal relationship with any of the authors that may be of relevance

Column 1

No conflicts

I may have a conflict of interest

May know authors but no conflict

Please copy and paste the citation for the article to be peer reviewed in the box below. including version number *

Please rate the relevance of the data/ research/ argument/ presented in the different sections of the manuscript based on the following criteria *

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Relevant or Original topic

Writing style

Data/ argument

Tables / Figures

Consistent Conclusions

References

Based on your review what would be your recommendation to the editors? (this will not be published online)

Column 1

Recommend rejection

Recommend acceptance

Recommend acceptance with minor changes

Recommend acceptance with major changes

Would you be willing to review a resubmitted version

Please write your comments and recommendations to the authors (this will be published online). Please comment on subject, methods, results, discussion, conclusions and references. *

Please write a brief summary of your recommendations to the editors (this will not be published) including comments on writing style, grammer, figures and tables. Highlight any inconsistencies with the current literature.

Please mention here any further recommendations that you wish to make to the Editorial Board.

A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

reCAPTCHA

Privacy Terms

This form was created inside of BAPIO. Report Abuse

Forms