Spring 2019 English 242
Course Reflection - I have asked six specific questions below, and one open ended. Please think about the syllabus and course trajectory and answer at least four of the questions with as much specificity as you can. The feedback is greatly appreciated and will be put into play for the next iteration of the course. Everyone who responds should be able to read teh other responses (after submission). If not, please let me know and I will troubleshoot the access.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
1. Which of the theoretical readings (critical essays) was most helpful in framing the questions, issues, or practices of literary history and intertextuality?
2. Which formal assignment was the most challenging and why? Which did you most enjoy, and why?  
3. Which of the primary texts did you find the most intriguing and why? Do you have any suggestions regarding teaching/reading for future courses? (Was Ovid as our “hypotext” a text you would select again if given the opportunity? Other suggestions?)
4. What texts / concepts do you wish we would have explored / discussed more?
5. What do you think will be the two or three most prominent ideas regarding either content or theory that you will carry forward with you from this course?
6.  Although we didn't have an opportunity to make a "second pass" at revising the intertextuality site, do you feel that it could be a helpful resource for future students? If not, what should be improved? http://literaryhistoryguide.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/
7. Feel free to add any other observations.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
PrivacyTerms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms