【聯署:要求雀巢停止於奶粉產品使用有害嬰兒健康之成份】/ Petition for Nestlé to stop using harmful ingredients in its formula products!
全球化監察希望透過收集聯署,喚起公眾對此議題的注意,並向奶粉商雀巢施加壓力,逼使雀巢改善其營商及銷售策略。希望各位支持!圖片在聯署底部提供。

Please scroll down for the English version of the petition.

Globalization Monitor is collecting signatures in order to raise public awareness and put pressure on Nestlé to rectify its problematic business and marketing practices. We need your support! Images available below.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
要求雀巢立即將有問題的奶粉產品下架 停止於產品添加有害嬰兒健康之成份
就《解密奶粉》(http://bit.ly/2Kh3HBM) 的研究發現,全球化監察現呼籲各界人士參與聯署,要求言而無信的雀巢停止使用有害嬰幼兒健康之成份,立即將有問題產品下架!

瑞士跨國奶粉商雀巢2018年3月向本地非牟利機構全球化監察及駐英國的改變市場基金會作出三項承諾:

1. 停止在其二段 (即6-12月齡) 產品中添加雲呢拿調味劑成份,並將含有雲呢拿調味劑的二段產品下架。[i], [ii]

2. 移除超級能恩系列的產品包裝上「不添加蔗糖、雲呢嗱味或調味劑,讓嬰兒健康成長」的陳述。

3. 移除其二段配方奶粉產品中的蔗糖成份,並將含有蔗糖的二段產品下架。[iii]

直至今日,雀巢竟然一項承諾也沒有履行!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
📍 成份有害嬰幼兒健康
蔗糖及雲呢拿調味劑均會對嬰幼兒的身體和新陳代謝系統造成不必要的負擔,對其健康構成不良影響。因此全球化監察和改變市場基金會在進行《打破奶粉商科學神話》(https://goo.gl/vgsvFR) 的研究時發現這些問題後,便與雀巢會面,要求雀巢立刻改善。

📍 雀巢無視全球化監察訴求
《解密奶粉》研究發現雀巢在香港有售的二段惠氏S-26 Ultima SMA奶粉仍然含有香蘭素 (亦稱香草醛,vanillin)。雀巢於中國內地發售的兩款產品也含有雲呢嗱調味:二段惠氏啟賦含乙基香蘭素 (ethyl vanillin),而二段惠氏愛兒樂則含香蘭素。
可笑的是,《解密奶粉》發現含有香蘭素的惠氏S-26 Ultima SMA批次,並不是全球化監察和改變市場基金會首次發現有問題的批次,這一點從產品的新包裝便清晰可見。雀巢竟然優先花時間和資源去更新其產品包裝,卻沒有移除產品中可能為嬰兒的代謝系統帶來負擔的不必要成份,我們對此感到極度失望。

另外,雀巢在所有月齡 (包括二段) 的超級能恩包裝上仍保留「不添加蔗糖、雲呢嗱味或調味劑,讓嬰兒健康成長」的陳述。雀巢一方面在某些產品中添加蔗糖和各類調味劑,另一方面卻指出不含這些成份的產品才有利嬰兒健康成長,嚴重誤導照顧者。雀巢竟然搬出「有問題的舊批次產品已在生產綫或已在市面上銷售」的藉口來解釋為何未能履行移除標籤有問題的包裝,看來雀巢對照顧者的需要和消費者權益根本漠不關心。

📍 雀巢公關自認過失
雀巢全球公關主任於四月八日致函全球化監察,親自承認從其產品配方中淘汰蔗糖的過程還有3% 未完成,原因是雀巢仍在等待新的配方完成註冊。他表示完成註冊後,雀巢「將逐步採用不含蔗糖的新配方,並希望在未來幾個月內完成此過程。」
產品有問題,甚至可能對嬰幼兒健康有害,為何不立刻下架,要先等新配方完成註冊?可見雀巢利字當頭,堅持不對銷量造成任何損失的原則,罔顧對全球嬰幼兒和照顧者應負的責任,亦完全違背它在網上宣稱要「提升生活品質,貢獻於更健康的未來」的發展目標。

全球化監察現敦促雀巢遵守承諾,立即將現時有問題產品下架,停止於未來批次的產品中添加蔗糖、雲呢拿香精或其他調味劑,並向公眾交代實現這些承諾的確實時間表!

全球化監察《解密奶粉》研究:https://bit.ly/2W9dlIc
📗報告全文:http://bit.ly/2Kh3HBM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i] 歐洲食品安全局強烈反對在奶粉中添加調味劑和其他不必要的物質,因為這些成份最終須被排出體外,因此會對嬰兒的新陳代謝造成不必要負擔。(EFSA NDA Panel (2014). Scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae. EFSA Journal, 12(7): 3760–3866.)

[ii] 營養專家不建議給嬰兒餵食調味劑,因為這可能導致他們日後偏好甜食。(First Steps Nutrition Trust (2016) Sugar in fortified milks marketed for children over 1 year.)

[iii] 歐洲食品安全局強烈反對在奶粉中添加蔗糖,其理由是「它會導致嚴重的症狀,包括餵食情況差、嘔吐及某些嬰兒無法健康成長」,且會「增加嬰兒對甜味的偏好」,導致長大後容易肥胖。(EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies) (2014). Scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae.)
Nestlé must take problematic products off shop shelves and stop adding harmful ingredients to its infant formula products!
Based on the findings in our research report Deceit, Rule-bending and Other Malpractices (http://bit.ly/2G17Swl), Globalization Monitor is appealing to all of you to participate in our petition to demand Nestlé to stop using ingredients that are harmful to infant health in their formula products, and immediately remove problematic products from shop shelves!

Heavyweight Swiss formula milk manufacturer Nestlé met with local NGO Globalization Monitor and the Britain-based Changing Markets Foundation in March 2018 and pledged to:

1. Stop adding vanilla flavourings to its stage two formula products (i.e. products designed for infants aged 6 to 12 months) and remove all such products that contain vanilla flavouring from shop shelves. [i], [ii]
2. Remove the nutritional advice on the NAN PRO product series that states they contain “no added sucrose, vanilla flavour or flavourings for babies’ healthy growth”.
3. Stop adding sucrose to its stage two formula products and remove all such products that contain sucrose from shop shelves. [iii]

Atrociously, Nestlé has not followed through on ANY of the commitments it made a year ago!

📍 Ingredients harmful to infant health

Sucrose and vanilla flavouring both put an unnecessary burden on infants’ metabolic system and may undermine their health. Therefore, when Globalization Monitor and Changing Markets Foundation discovered Nestlé’s use of these additives during our research for the Busting the myth of science-based formula report (https://goo.gl/vgsvFR), we demanded to meet with Nestlé and urged the company to rectify the issue.

📍 Nestlé ignored Globalization Monitor’s demands

Our Deceit, Rule-bending and Other Malpractices research found that Nestlé’s Wyeth S-26 Ultima SMA – sold in Hong Kong – still contains vanillin, while Wyeth illuma and Wyeth S-26 Gold – both sold in mainland China – contains ethyl vanillin and vanillin respectively.

The batch of Wyeth S-26 Ultima SMA which was found to contain vanillin in our newest research is not the same batch as the one investigated by Globalization Monitor and Changing Markets Foundation more than a year ago. This is evident from the product’s new packaging design, and alarmingly means that Nestlé has put upgrading its packaging before removing an ingredient that could burden infants’ metabolism and contribute to the development of a preference for sweet tastes in later life. We are very disappointed to see where Nestlé’s priorities are.

Furthermore, Nestlé continues to market its NAN PRO formula product line as containing “no added sucrose, vanilla flavour or flavourings”, ostensibly “for babies’ healthy growth”. It is very misleading for carers when, on one hand, Nestlé sells them products that contain sucrose and various flavourings but, on the other hand, informs them that formula products without such ingredients are healthier for infants.

In its correspondence to Globalization Monitor, Nestlé claimed that “the change of label has not been completed yet because of the labels that were already in the value chain or printed. This process can take time before the products with the old labels are fully phased out of the system.” Nestlé’s excuse demonstrates that it cares more about its profits than the needs of infants and carers and the right of consumers to be correctly informed.

📍 Nestlé admits fault

Nestlé’s Global Deputy Head of Public Affairs, Ms Pindelwa Mda, got in touch with Globalization Monitor via email on 8th April, conceding that the phasing out of sucrose in approximately 3% of their formula recipes for infants from 6 to 12 months is still incomplete. The reason Ms Mda gave was that Nestlé is still waiting for the registration of new recipes, and that “once the registration process with authorities has been finalised, we will phase in new recipes that contain no sucrose and hope that this process will be completed in the next few months.”

If a product is found to be problematic and potentially harmful to infant and young children health, the responsible thing to do is to immediately withdraw it from the market. Instead, Nestlé is insisting on waiting for the registration of a new recipe before removing the problematic products, which again shows how Nestlé puts its profits before fulfilling its social responsibility as a baby food manufacturer. Nestlé’s business strategy also goes against its publicly-professed purpose of “enhancing quality of life and contributing to a healthier future”.

Globalization Monitor hereby urges Nestlé to take its promises seriously: Nestlé must immediately withdraw problematic products from sale, stop adding sucrose, vanilla flavouring and other harmful additives into future batches of infant formula products, and provide the concerned public with a concrete and precise timeline for these changes to be implemented!

📕 Globalization Monitor’s research – Deceit, Rule-bending and Other Malpractices, full report in English: http://bit.ly/2G17Swl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i] The European Food Safety Authority advises against the addition of unnecessary substances which ‘put a burden on the infant’s metabolism’ because they have to be excreted.
EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies) (2014). Scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae.

[ii] Nutritional experts advise against the consumption of flavourings in infancy, as this might contribute to the development of a preference for sweet tastes in later life.
First Steps Nutrition Trust (2016) Sugar in fortified milks marketed for children over 1 year.

[iii] The European Food Safety Authority specifically advises against the addition of sucrose on the grounds that “it can lead to severe symptoms, including poor feeding, vomiting and overall failure to thrive in some infants’ and ‘it may, because of their greater sweetness, increase the preference for sweet tastes in infants.”
EFSA NDA Panel (2014). Scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae. EFSA Journal, 12(7): 3760–3866.
姓名 / Name *
代表機構 (如有) / Organisation represented (if any)
雀巢產品含有雲呢嗱調味劑 / Use of vanillin flavourings in Nestle products
包裝陳述有誤導成分 / Misleading nutritional advice
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of 全球化監察. Report Abuse