Combustion Modeling Feedback
Please submit feedback regarding the Computational tools that you have used in the past. I am trying to create a comprehensive review of tools & modules in Ansys Forte & Chemkin, Coverge.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Experience Level in CFD *
Required
Ansys Chemkin & Forte *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
It has a strong UX design to display results.
It can efficiently mesh complex geometries.
It can handle complex physics involved in Combustion research.
It has a lot of tutorials/information available.
It is compatible to Data science algorithms such as AI, ML.
Converge CFD *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
It has a strong UX design to display results.
It can efficiently mesh complex geometries.
It can handle complex physics involved in Combustion research.
It has a lot of tutorials/information available.
It is compatible to Data science algorithms such as AI, ML.
What aspects of this Ansys/Converge software were most useful or valuable? *
What suggestions do you have to improve existing tools/models in Ansys/Converge? *
What parameters are most critical to selecting a right Combustion modeling software. (E.g price, training,etc) *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Report Abuse