Evaluation for CE Program: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain with Hispanic Clients (Recorded Webinar)
Sponsoring Organization: The Multicultural Counseling Institute
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
How to fill out this form: On your screen, mark your choice in each of the rows. Alternatively, you can print the form and use a pen.
1. The program objectives were met.
A. Objective #1 List the factors that impact Hispanics' access to and completion of chronic pain treatment.
*
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
B. Objective #2 Describe pain perception in Hispanic clients as compared to other ethnicities.
*
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
C. Objective #3 Use a relevant biopsychosocial framework to conceptualize Hispanics' treatment of chronic pain.
*
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
5. Teaching methods were effective. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Instructor 1
Name: Mirna Mejia, Ph.D.
7. Knew the subject matter. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
8. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies). *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
9. Elaborated upon the stated objectives. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
10. Maintained my interest. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
11. Answered questions effectively. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
12. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
13. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations). *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Professional & Ethical Issues
14. Presenter (or program chair, etc.) made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: *
Yes
No
a. Requirements for successful completion of activity
b. Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)
c. Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest
d. Commercial support of benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)
e. Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks
Venue, Setting, etc.
15. Facility was adequate for my needs *
16. Special needs were met. *
17. Facility was comfortable and accessible. *
18. Food and beverage were adequate (if applicable) *
19. Program brochure was informative and accurate *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Learning
20. Information could be applied to my practice or other work context. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
21. Information contributes to achieving personal or professional goals. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
22. Issues of diversity were addressed. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
23. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
24. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
25. This program enhanced my professional expertise. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
26. I would recommend this program to others. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
27. Teaching methods and tools focused on how to apply program content to my practice/work environment. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
28. Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
29. The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Participant Information
30. Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply) *
Required
31. Please note years in your profession *
Required
Narrative
Please type in your responses
32. What was overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?
33. What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?
34. What topics or presenters would like to see at future CE presentations?
35. Other comments
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of tmcinstitute.org. Report Abuse