Continuing Excellence - Course Evaluation Form
Course Name: Supervision, Screen Time, and Safety: Community Management of Individuals with CSAM-Only Offenses

Date: January 14, 2022

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Explain how clients who commit CSAM offenses differ in terms of risk from clients who commit contact sexual offenses.
2) Discuss the unique needs of clients who commit CSAM offenses.
3) Implement appropriate supervision strategies for clients who commit CSAM offenses.
4) Implement skills-based interventions to use with clients who commit CSAM offenses.
5) Describe how skills from Motivational Interviewing can inform supervision and practice with individuals who have sexually abused.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Last Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate) *
First Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate) *
License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)
Issuing state/province, if applicable
Which of the following best describes you? *
I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. *
Required
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? *
5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? *
5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor's knowledge and expertise of the subject (Dr. Gonsalves) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor's knowledge and expertise of the subject (Mr. Schuldies) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3. Rate the third instructor's knowledge and expertise of the subject (Mrs. Pierre) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor's teaching ability (Dr. Gonsalves) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor's teaching ability (Mr. Schuldies) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3. Rate the third instructor's teaching ability (Mrs. Pierre) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? *
Learning Objective #1: "Explain how clients who commit CSAM offenses differ in terms of risk from clients who commit contact sexual offenses," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? *
Learning Objective #2: "Discuss the unique needs of clients who commit CSAM offenses," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? *
Learning Objective #3: "Implement appropriate supervision strategies for clients who commit CSAM offenses," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? *
Learning Objective #4: "Implement skills-based interventions to use with clients who commit CSAM offenses," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? *
Learning Objective #5: "Describe how skills from Motivational Interviewing can inform supervision and practice with individuals who have sexually abused," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) *
5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process *
5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor's responsiveness to questions (Dr. Gonsalves) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
13.2. Rate the second instructor's responsiveness to questions (Mr. Schuldies) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
13.3. Rate the third instructor's responsiveness to questions (Mrs. Pierre) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
14. Rate the program staff's responsiveness to questions *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? *
16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? *
17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? *
18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? *
19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training?
20. OPTIONAL: What country are you from?
21. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you'd like to share with us?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
PrivacyTerms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms