JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Faculty Feedback on Curriculum
Dear Faculty,
Please take a few minutes to complete this survey. Your feedback is vital in designing the syllabi, and ultimately the full curriculum, for the students. Thank you for contributing to this important work.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Name of the Faculty
*
Your answer
Designation
*
Choose
Professor
Associative Professor
Assistant Professor
Name of the department
*
Choose
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA SCIENCE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Contact Number
*
Your answer
Feedback Questionnaire
Please give your valuable feedback on curriculum and syllabus to improve quality of the programme.
Ratings are in 5 point scale: 5 - Excellent, 4 - Very Good, 3 – Good, 2 - Satisfactory, 1 - Poor.
1.
Course organization and structure in the curriculum
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
2. Curriculum of the program is well designed and promotes learning experience of the students
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
3.
How do you rate the syllabus of the courses that student have studied in relation to the competencies expected out of the course?
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
4. Scope for experimental and experiential learning
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
5.Allocation of credits and distribution of the contact hours (L-T-P-J) to the course
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
6. The books prescribed / listed as reference materials are relevant, updated and appropriate.
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
7. Curriculum Supports for extra learning or self learning
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
8. The examination system followed by the University is effective.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
9. Evaluation scheme designed for different categories of the courses
(Effective evaluation system)
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
10. Course outcomes stated for each course
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
11. The faculty are updating their knowledge and skills
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
12. Scope for adopting latest teaching methods and tools
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
13. The library is utilized optimally by the faculty.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
14. The teaching aids in the department are sufficient and up to date.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
15. The teachers are encouraged to organize seminars/workshops/symposia/conferences.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
16. The teachers are encouraged to participate in seminars /workshops/symposia/conferences.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
17. The teachers are encouraged to establish linkage with Industry.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
18. buildings and furniture are well maintained.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
19. The administration is sincerely putting efforts for the development of the institution.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
20. The administration is accessible.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
21. How do you rate the offering of the electives in terms of their relevance to the specialization streams?
*
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
22. The quality initiatives taken up during the last academic year are contributing for improvement.
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
23. Faculty members have the freedom to express their opinion
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
24. The IQAC is working well for promoting quality in the institution
Poor
1
2
3
4
5
Excellent
Clear selection
25. Any other Suggestions
*
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
