Intro Program Evaluation Form Fall
Evaluation forms are an essential component of our Continuing Education programming and approval and are a much appreciated part of our program review process. All participants are asked to complete evaluation forms. For the narrative questions, if a question does not apply, please type in NA. Your responses are anonymous and your emails are not tracked. The email accounts are used simply to ensure that you do not complete this form more than one time; however, you will be able to return to the form at any time to edit your responses. We greatly appreciate your help in improving our programs. If you have any questions, email the center administrator, Charla Malamed, at mrcinfo@mitchellrelationalcenter.org.
Program *
Semester *
Required
Week 1 & 2: Overview of the Program and Key Concepts- Lauren Levine, PhD and Anita Herron, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
How well did this module introduce you to the contributing theories and key concepts of Relational psychotherapy?
Week 3: Freud - Jill Salberg, Ph.D. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I can formulate Freud's early theories of mind, and identify key issues in mourning and melancholic depression, as well as symptoms that bring patients into treatment.
Weeks 4: Ferenczi - Tony Bass, Ph.D. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I now have an appreciation of Ferenczi's clinical and theoretical contributions to psychoanalysis in relation to his contemporaries and to the subsequent development of relational practice.
Week 5: Klein - Tom Johnson, Ph.D. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I am now able to identify the dynamics of envy.
Week 6: Winnicott - Joyce Slochower, Ph.D. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This module introduced me to several of Winnicott's core ideas: holding, regression to dependence, and use of the object, as well as the impact of these concepts on contemporary relational thought.
This module helped me learn about the impact of these concepts on contemporary relational thought.
Week 7: American Interpersonal Analysis- Margaret Black Mitchell, LCSW *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module I am now able to describe an Interpersonal approach to psychotherapy.
Week 8: Fairbairn - Amy Schwartz Cooney, Ph.D. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I am now able to identify the important aspects of Fairbairn’s theoretical contributions and discuss their contributions to contemporary clinical practice.
Week 9: Contemporary Self Psychology & Inter-Subjectivity- Barry Magid, MD. *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I now understand the principles of Self Psychology according to Kohut and the differences between Freudian and Self Psychological approaches to narcissism.
After participating in this module, I am now able to demonstrate, through discussion, the Self Psychological approach to transference analysis through the use of the empathic perspective and attention to empathic ruptures.
Week 10: Inhabiting Implication- Rachel Kabasakalian-McKay, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
Students will be able to identify at least one meaning for "inhabiting implication" in the context of racial enactments.
Week 11: Gender in Relational Perspectives- Stephen Hartman *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I am able to explain how shifts in the use of the concept “gender” in the late twentieth century coincided with the evolution of relational concepts in psychoanalysis and use those terms in clinical formulations.
OVERALL LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR FALL SEMESTER *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
After completing the fall semester, I can describe, compare, and contrast the essential contributions of the theorists whose work has been covered so far.
After completing the fall semester, I have a deeper understanding of the historical course of the theoretical debates that have culminated in the development of Relational Psychoanalysis.
After completing the fall semester, I can evaluate and assess for myself which theoretical models are more compatible with my own thinking and the usefulness of these ideas for contemporary clinical work.
What, for you, was the highlight of this semester?
If you were to change anything, what would it be?  
What was most effective?
What was least effective?
What is your overall impression of the technological aspects of virtual Zoom setup and experience?
What is your overall impression of the registration process?
If you participated in a seminar that included those who attended remotely, what was your experience of that?
Are there any other comments you would like to share with us?
Would you recommend this seminar to a friend / colleague?
Clear selection
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms