Course Evaluation/ Faculty Feedback form [MBA III-Sem AY:2020-2021]
Please submit feedback regarding the course you will soon be completing, including feedback on course structure, content, and instructor.
 
Note:
1.Teachers may individualize or adapt this form to their own purpose. This is known as a formative evaluation.  Its purpose is solely to improve the quality of teaching by providing feedback to the instructor regarding your impressions of this course.

2.The form is meant for taking feedback on faculty members listed below (Subject-wise).

3.-The students who have not opted FRM may RESPOND as "NEUTRAL" in that specific section.
   -The students who have not opted IF may RESPOND as "NEUTRAL" in that specific section.
   -OM/E-B/OR were the common subjects. Innovation Management is an Interdisciplinary in nature and also common.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Your Hall-Ticket No Falls Between (Suppose your hall-ticket no is between 1-20 Select option-I and so on) *
Your own contribution to learning *
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Very good
Excellent
I was regular to the classes
I was attentive during lectures
I have participated in presentations
I liked mentorship
Skill and responsiveness of the Operations Management-instructor (Asso. Prof. Mrs. Muneer Sultana): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the E-Business-instructor (Asst. Prof. Mrs. Afreen Siddiqua): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the Operations Research-instructor (Asst. Prof. Mrs. Asma Sayeed): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the Financial Risk Management-instructor (Asst. Prof. Mr. Mohd Rukunuddin Siddiqui): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the Financial Risk Management-instructor (Asso. Prof. Mrs. Muneer Sultana): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the International Finance-instructor (Asso. Prof. Mrs. Zeenath Sumaira): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
Skill and responsiveness of the Innovation Management-instructor (Asst. Prof. Mr. Mohd Azharuddin Zubair): *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Instructor was an effective lecturer/demonstrator
Presentations were clear and organized
Instructor stimulated student interest
Instructor effectively used time during class periods
Instructor invited Doubts/Questions from the students
Doubts/Questions raised were cleared
Instructor was available and helpful after the session
What aspects of this course of III-Semester were most useful or valuable?
What would be your suggestions to improve this course (III-Semester Subjects and Teaching Practices)?
A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
PrivacyTerms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms