A3 Peer Review
Use this form to submit a single peer review for A3. Please take care to complete the form carefully and completely. Remember that you must submit three separate forms, one for each assigned project. For more details, see https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse442/22wi/a3-review.html
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Your Name *
Include your first and last name.
Your UW NetID *
This is your UW login name, not an id number.
Reviewed Project URL *
The URL of the project you are evaluating. Provide a complete HTTPS GitHub pages URL, e.g., "https://cse442-22w.github.io/A3-Project-Name". This URL string should exactly match the URL string assigned to you on Canvas.
Visual Encodings Review
Are expressive and effective visual encodings applied? How well do they reveal the most important features or trends of the underlying data? Is critical data easily seen, or is it unnecessarily "hidden" and only revealed in response to interaction? Is the target audience likely to understand the visualization?
I Like... *
Praise for design ideas and/or well-executed implementation details.
I Wish... *
Constructive statements on how the design might be improved or further refined.
What If... *
Suggest alternative design directions, or even wacky half-baked ideas.
Interaction Techniques Review
Do the supported interaction techniques enable more effective discovery of interesting trends, patterns or outliers? Do they engage the viewer in a process of meaningful exploration or learning? Are the interactions well-implemented, without notable performance issues or usability problems?
I Like... *
Praise for design ideas and/or well-executed implementation details.
I Wish... *
Constructive statements on how the design might be improved or further refined.
What If... *
Suggest alternative design directions, or even wacky half-baked ideas.
Design Quality Review
Assess the overall design quality in terms of organization and presentation. Are elements appropriately titled or labeled? Is there appropriate spacing, layout, legible type, and other forms of design styling? Is it clear where to begin viewing/interacting with the design? Is the overall display confusing or cluttered? How successful is the prototype in meeting the intended goals?
I Like... *
Praise for design ideas and/or well-executed implementation details.
I Wish... *
Constructive statements on how the design might be improved or further refined.
What If... *
Suggest alternative design directions, or even wacky half-baked ideas.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
PrivacyTerms
This form was created inside of UW Computer Science & Engineering. Report Abuse
Google Forms