OOPSLA 2021 Artifact Evaluation Self-Nominations
If you are interested in serving on the OOPSLA 2021 Artifact Evaluation Committee, please fill out this form.

The bulk of reviewing work will occur between the first-round decisions for OOPSLA 2021 (July 2) and early September.

This form is set up for you to self-identify as a senior PhD student or post-doc *at the time of paper submissions* (so for example, graduating PhD students or post-docs on the job market currently are welcome, in addition to people in the middle of such positions).

Senior PhD student means you have at least one publication in a major PL or related venue from during your PhD.  Major PL venues (OOPSLA, POPL, PLDI, ICFP, ECOOP, ESOP, TOPLAS, JFP, CAV) certainly count, as do major SE venues (ICSE, FSE, ASE, ISSTA, TSE, TOSEM, etc.) and other related venues (e.g., ASPLOS) if the topic of your paper is related to the topics of OOPSLA.  This list of venues is intended to be *suggestive*, but not complete: there are too many appropriate venues to list and previous years have had reviewers with papers from other venues not listed above (hence our request for a list of your publications below).

Post-docs here would be any non-permanent post-PhD academic research position under the mentorship of a faculty member, regardless of the wording of your official title.

We are explicitly not seeking current faculty members (for reasons outlined here: https://www.artifact-eval.org/aec-structure-guidelines.html).

We expect to need many reviewers, so please feel free to share this with colleagues and friends who may be interested and qualified.

The questions near the end about access to compute resources do *not* play a role in deciding who is on the committee, but are purely informative for the AEC co-chairs to determine what sorts of additional compute resources to seek out.
Увійдіть в обліковий запис Google, щоб зберегти надані відповіді. Докладніше
Name *
Affiliation *
Email *
DBLP, Google Scholar, or Institutional Homepage listing your publications (whatever is easiest or most complete) *
Status *
Access to compute resources: please select the kinds of compute resources you expect to have access to for purposes of evaluating artifacts.  Most artifacts require only a laptop or workstation typical for PhD students and post-docs, but some artifacts do require specialized hardware. This question is just to figure out, of those who join the committee, what kinds of artifacts would be feasible to evaluate entirely within the committee.  (Does not affect nomination process, but informs chairs seeking additional sources of compute resources)
Topic Expertise: What areas would you consider yourself qualified to review artifacts in?
Надіслати
Очистити форму
Ніколи не вказуйте паролі в Google Формах.
Компанія Google не створювала цей вміст і не підтримує його. Повідомити про порушення - Умови використання - Політика конфіденційності