Whales are found in many different marine environments, including polar regions where photosynthesis & biomass production is very limited. How does this information affect these two hypotheses?
Explain your reasoning for your choice in the previous question. Why does this seem like the most accurate response? What is inaccurate about the other responses?
Which of the following would be a possible rationale* for the first hypothesis? (First hypothesis: changes in DNA caused the whale's large body size)
*A rationale is the reasoning and evidence that supports a hypothesis.
Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would most support the second hypothesis? (Second hypothesis: easier access to food caused the whale's large body size)
Based on the information at the top of page 3, what is the purpose of the EGF gene?(Click here to access the Packet)
Which of the following describes the EGF protein in many of the largest whales?
Whales with a dysfunctional EGF gene…
For the data included here, the whales in bold are those over 10 m (33 feet). The largest whales tend to be part of the mysticetes (toothless) group. In contrast, whales in the odontocetes (toothed) group tend to be smaller. What is one conclusion that would be supported by this data?
How is your first conclusion supported by this data?
What is a second conclusion that would be supported by this data?
How is your second conclusion supported by this data?
Based on this data, which seems more accurate - the first hypothesis (whales are big because of changes to their DNA), or the second hypothesis (whales are big because of more access to their food)?
Explain your reasoning for your choice in the previous question. Why does this seem like the most accurate response? How does the accompanying data support your ideas?
Does this form look suspicious? Report