Movement Strategy Recommendations

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Our Movement has analyzed, discussed, and distilled ideas for our future into recommendations for how to bring the strategic vision to life. These outline how we can grow sustainably and inclusively.

We would like to understand how they would impact our movement - what benefits and opportunities do you foresee for your community, and why? What challenges or barriers would they pose for you? The recommendations will influence the movement on various levels (global, regional, and local).

Please join in to help foster meaningful discussions around this body of recommendations; your thoughts and reactions are invaluable to how we will jointly shape our future by 2030.

What approach / background are you representing? (Use whatever areas of identity are relevant to your group, whether gender, race / ethnicity, age, perspective, group history, user group or affiliate .)

Please add additional context about your feedback and more comments about the recommendation in the OTHER text field present in one of the options of each question.

#1 Promote Sustainability and Resilience - increased access to resources, expanded direct revenue generation, and more volunteer support systems for collaboration and recognition.

Should a dedicated local affiliate staff be hired for improving community growth and facilitation in decision making? *

Yes

Other:

How can compensation process for non-editing volunteerism (for instance GLAM work) improve your community projects? *

Create the space for sustainable growth and resilience

Improve local capacity for leadership, decision-making, and accountability

It will give more time for volunteers to edit on Wiki because it will be professionals who do the non-editing tasks.

Reach the highest potential for our partnerships for GLAM institutions

Don't support this outcome - This cannot benefit our community growth in the long run

Other:

Should there be a document that captures basic rules for fundraising adjusted according to local context and needs? *

This can create inequity due to limitations on international donations

This may balance out the existing power disparity within big organization

Other:

How can more work be done on brand awareness of Wikimedia to improve the scope of the overall movement projects? *

It can secure the attention, trust, and interest of users, volunteers, and partners.

Too much resources get invested with little outcome. Don't support this outcome.

Other:

Should there be a dedicated analysis on core issues which prevent our software platform for third party platforms, such as kiwix? *

It can create better inclusion and opportunities for technical developers and partners for sharing movement resources

Cannot support unless research shows concrete outcomes

Against this recommendation outcome

Other:

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside of Wikimedia Foundation. Report Abuse

Forms