Scopus 등재를 위한 학술지 관리 프로그램(Self-check list)

안녕하세요. 과편협입니다. 


위의 링크에서 먼저 예비평가 항목을 시행하신 후, 
문의하고 싶으신 내용을 남겨주시면 10월 27일(금) Scopus 등재를 위한 학술지 관리 프로그램 II Q&A 시간에 답변드릴 수 있도록 준비하겠습니다.

문의를 원하시는 항목번호에 질문 사항을 작성하여 제출하여 주시기 바랍니다.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
1. The Journal has a minimum of 2 year publication history
2. Journal has a unique title, not identical to one already indexed in Scopus
3. The journal publishes peer-reviewed content

- This process, as well as any policies related to the journal’s peer review procedures, shall be clearly described on the journal website, including the method of peer review used.

- Journal websites should not guarantee manuscript acceptance or very short peer review
4. Abstracts, titles and keywords are in English; authors – in Roman script
5. References are in (translated/transliterated) Roman script (recommended but not mandatory)
6. Journal is published regularly and per publishing schedule, which available at journal’s website
7. Ethics and malpractice statement is available in English at journal’s website
8. Journal has ISSN and/or e-ISSN/ISSN-L, confirmed by international ISSN Center is clearly displayed.
9. Journal has dedicated website in English (alone or in addition to website in local language)
10. Author instructions (guide for authors) are available in English at journal’s website
11. Aims and Scope are available in English and presented at journal’s website
12. Geographical diversity:
12. Geographical diversity:
12.1 of Editors – is according to claimed journal’s aim and scope
12.2 of Authors – is according to claimed journal’s aim and scope
13. Journal’s documents are cited by Scopus sources
14. Journal’s editors are experts in subject area, covered by the journal
15. Journal publications have DOI (recommended but not mandatory)
16. Content quality
16.1 The journal consistently publishes articles that are scientifically sound and relevant to an international academic or professional audience in this field.
16.2 The content of the articles is consistent with the stated scope and aims of the journal and consistently of high academic quality
16.3 Tables and figures in articles are clear and well configured within article content (are not just copied-pasted from Excel)
16.4 The language and grammar of articles are good. Content of the articles is logically structured, easily readable and understandable
16.5 The abstracts are clear, easily readable and provide an excellent comprehensive summary of the article of sufficient length
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of kcse. Report Abuse
Google Forms