UCL Injuries Course Evaluation
Activity Title: UCL Injuries in the Overhead Athlete - Anatomy, Risk Factors, And Interventions
Speaker/Presenter: Sandra Harris, MS ATC and Randy Harris, MS ATC CES

Precision Athletic Training, PO Box 303, Dunstable MA 01827 781-366-1880
Precision Athletic Training is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to offer continuing education to athletic trainers. BOC Approved Provider #P8644
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Name (optional)
Date *
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
How would you rate... *
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
This program overall
Your abilities before this program
Your abilities after this program
Please rate the projected impact of this activity on your competence, performance, and patient outcomes: *
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This activity increased my competence
This activity will improve my performance.
This activity will improve my patient outcomes.
How will you change your practice as a result of this activity? *
What barriers, besides time and/or money, do you anticipate encountering as you make changes in your practice? *
Upon completion of this program, are you able to: *
Yes
No
Partially
Describe the relevant Anatomy of the medial Elbow
Discuss risk factors associated with UCL injury in the overhead athlete
Implement intervention programs to address risk factors associated with UCL injury
Do you feel that the information presented was based on the best available evidence?   *
If no, please explain.
What percentage of this material do you feel is useful to you?
Were Sandra and Randy Harris knowledgeable, relevant and effective regarding the content of their presentation? *
Yes
No
Knowledgeable
Relevant
Effective
If no to any of the 3, please explain.
Did you feel that there was commercial bias or influence in this activity?   *
If yes, please explain.
Was a verbal or written statement regarding conflict of interest disclosed? *
Rate the following components of this program: *
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The information received was useful, appropriate, and adequately in-depth
The program met the stated learning objectives.
Teaching and learning methods were effective
The program faculty was responsive to questions/comments.
The educational materials were useful.
The learning assessment (survey, quiz, etc.) was appropriate.
Rate the following components of this program: *
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Registration process
Program faculty
Meals
Lodging accommodations
Exhibitors/vendors
Facility
What did you like most about this program?
What did you like least about this program?
General Comments:
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms