Petition to the CJI India regarding Prof GN Saibaba -- initiated by InSAF India (www.academicfreedomindia.com)
June 09, 2022

To
Justice N.V. Ramana
Chief Justice of India
Supreme Court of India
3, Janpath, New Delhi-110 001

Dear Justice N.V. Ramana,

We, the undersigned international civil society and academic organizations, are deeply concerned by the deteriorating health condition of Delhi University English professor G.N. Saibaba. Since March 7, 2017, he has been imprisoned in the maximum security Anda Cell in the Nagpur Central Prison in the State of Maharashtra for challenging systemic oppression and discrimination. The Anda cells (named such as they resemble an egg) confine prisoners to windowless concrete cells for sixteen hours a day allowing them to step out in an open space which is also concrete, with no greenery, burning with the intense heat, especially during the summer months. It is with grave concern for his chances of survival in these prison conditions, we humbly request you to intervene and take appropriate measures to save the life of Prof. G.N. Saibaba.

We know Prof. G.N. Saibaba not only as a member of the academic community, but also as a social justice activist who has fought for the democratic rights of the oppressed, adivasis (indigenous people of India), Dalits (so-called untouchables), women, religious minorities, and oppressed nationalities. We also know that he is 90 percent disabled and has been suffering from 19 chronic and acute postpolio medical conditions, some of which are fatal and need immediate medical intervention.

We would like to remind you of the fact that Prof. G.N. Saibaba was arrested and imprisoned for his ideas. The plot against him started with a search warrant issued by a judicial magistrate on September 7, 2013 to seize alleged stolen property from G.N. Saibaba’s residence. In the search operation on September 17th, the officials claimed to have found digital evidence (articles, documents) that could establish links between Saibaba’s activism and the Communist Party of India (Maoist). It was very well reported in the media that not only the police raid but also the way the search was conducted directly violated the Indian Evidence Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Section 100). Following the raid, on May 9, 2014, police in plain clothes abducted Prof. Saibaba from a vehicle near his home and flew him to the Nagpur Central Prison in Maharashtra. The charges brought against him were related to “waging war against the state.”

A bail application was filed on May 15, 2014 in the Sessions Court, but it was denied on August 24th. On February 12, 2015, a second bail application, under Section 439, was filed because of his steadily deteriorating health. Once again, the bail application was rejected. Knowing Prof. Saibaba's deteriorating health, a social activist from the Vidharba region wrote a letter to the Chief Justice, High Court of Maharashtra, suo moto converted to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the High Court. This effort resulted in a temporary medical bail for six months. While this process was happening Prof. Saibaba fell extremely ill and was shifted to a public medical facility in Nagpur. The Chief Medical Officer of Nagpur Central Prison repeatedly declared that Prof. Saibaba is suffering from many health complications such as high blood pressure, bilateral kidney stones, a gallbladder stone, and kyphoscoliosis inducing rib crowding.

After a hasty trial, on March 7, 2017, Prof. G.N. Saibaba was sentenced to life in prison under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (Section 13, 18, 20, 38, 39) and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. In addition to digital evidence gathered from Prof. G.N. Saibaba’s house during the raid, the prosecution presented twenty-three witnesses. Twenty-two of the presented witnesses were policemen while the remaining witness was a Delhi citizen who knew nothing about the case, but was made to sign the the documented witness testimony by the police. When the verdict was announced, Prof. G.N. Saibaba was in an intensive care unit receiving treatment, but without any consideration of his health condition, he was shifted to solitary confinement in an Anda Cell. Since then Prof. G.N. Saibaba has been losing his remaining bodily abilities because of neglect and lack of proper care and so his “life sentence” is turning into a “death sentence.” In the past one year, he has twice tested positive for COVID-19. As his vital organs are failing, he is slowly dying.

Prof. G.N. Saibaba has been suffering from excruciating pain in both hands, back and hip, because of which he cannot sit for more than a few minutes. The extreme heat and cold conditions of the Anda Cell cause breathing difficulties for him. He also has regular episodes of dizziness. Doctors have recommended a thorough cardiovascular examination and treatment, which has not happened yet. In addition, he needs regular physiotherapy to revive his arm muscles, but even such a minor pain management procedure is not available in the jail and the authorities are not bringing him to a general physician on a regular basis.

In a recent installment of harassment, the jail authorities refused to provide a plastic water bottle to Prof. G.N. Saibaba who could not hold a metallic or glass bottle because he is losing the functional capacity of both arms. Learning this from Prof. G.N. Saibaba, his lawyer reported this to the media as dehydration caused him to faint several times. In retaliation to the media reports, the jail authorities placed a CCTV camera in his cell so that it records everything all day in the cell including the toilet area. When the jail authorities refused to remove the camera, he went on an indefinite hunger strike. After a four-day hunger strike, he lost consciousness and was admitted into a hospital. Finally, the jail authorities removed the camera and we are awaiting news of whether he received the water bottle. This is the arbitrary and brutal nature of his treatment in prison.

We strongly believe that Prof. G.N.Saibaba’s right to fair trial was obstructed by a biased political system. His incarceration is an example of the silencing of political dissent in India. Even though he is on the edge of  death, his parole request was rejected three times and medical bail application was denied two times. We appeal you to intervene and deliver justice to Prof. G.N. Saibaba. Immediately, in order to save his life, shift him from an Anda Cell to a wheelchair accessible barrack, then release him on medical bail and admit him in a multispecialty hospital for treatment.

We have great faith that you will respond promptly so that Prof. G.N. Saibaba will not face the same fate of Stan Swamy, accused in the Bhima Koregaon case, who died in judicial custody.

Signatories:

International Solidarity for Academic Freedom in India (InSAF India)

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Name of Organization *
Location *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy