LSIC In-Situ Resource Utilization 2023 Survey
With 2023 wrapping up, we're hoping to get a sense for what worked, what didn't work, and what you'd like to see in 2024 for the In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Focus Group in LSIC. Feel free to fill out as much of the survey as you feel comfortable. 

This survey is completely anonymous, and we will not share any user data. As always, if you have additional input for the LSIC ISRU Team, please feel free to reach out to any of us individually.

Thank you for your participation!

Best wishes,

Jodi Berdis (Jodi.Berdis@jhuapl.edu)
Karl Hibbitts (Karl.Hibbitts@jhuapl.edu)
Michael Nord (Michael.Nord@jhuapl.edu)
Rich Miller (Richard.S.Miller@jhuapl.edu)
Paul Burke (Paul.Burke@jhuapl.edu)
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Approximately how many ISRU telecons have you attended in 2023?
Clear selection
Which three 2023 ISRU events did you find MOST relevant to your work?
Which three 2023 ISRU events did you find LEAST relevant to your work?
On average, which format of monthly meetings would you most prefer for ISRU?
Clear selection
How important is discussing interoperability and systems integration across Focus Groups to you?
Not important at all
Extremely important
Clear selection
What technology gap are we not focusing on enough within LSIC that we should be focusing on more?
What technology gap is the biggest, and in critical need of additional attention and investment?
Clear selection
Is there a technology gap (or a gap within the gaps) that NASA is missing? Please explain!
I anticipate being involved in LOGIC (Lunar Operating Guidelines for Infrastructure Consortium). Further information is here, including how to stay informed: https://logic.jhuapl.edu/ 
Clear selection
What questions do you have about LOGIC? Any concerns?
I am aware of the Lunar Infrastructure Foundational Technologies-1 (LIFT-1) Demonstration from NASA STMD (Learn more here).
Clear selection
What topics from the ISRU Focus Group would you find valuable to support the LIFT-1 objectives?
Sufficient private capital exists to fund development in my industry/field to supplement NASA/federal funding and mature my technology in accordance with NASA's proposed timeline.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
Could you please elaborate on your above response?
The ISRU resources and information on the LSIC website (https://lsic.jhuapl.edu) are useful to me.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
Could you please elaborate on your above response?
The ISRU resources and information on the LSIC Confluence (https://lsic-wiki.jhuapl.edu) are useful to me.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
Could you please elaborate on your above response?
How can we make Confluence more useful?
The lines between STMD (Space Technology Mission Directorate), SMD (Science Mission Directorate), and ESDMD (Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate) efforts in my industry/field are clear to me.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
I would consider my industry/field to fall within the following technology gap(s). Please select more than one if applicable!
My organization is best described as:
Clear selection
If you would be willing to be contacted to discuss the above information further, please leave your contact information here!
If you could give a message to NASA's STMD, what would it be?
Do you have any other comments about the LSIC ISRU group, or LSIC in general?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms