JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
2022 Symposium Evaluation
Thank you for attending the NOAO 71st Annual Symposium! It was an honor to host you here in New Orleans, and we hope you join us again next year. Please submit your course feedback below.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
Content
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Format
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Faculty in General
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Faculty in Specific
Poor
Fair
Good
Outstanding
Wallace Alward, MD
Neil Baum, MD
Edward Buckley, MD
Jeffery Daigrepont (workshop)
Steve Gedde, MD
Davinder Grover, MD
John Hart, MD
Yuri McKee, MD
Faruk Orge, MD
Roberto Pineda, MD
Michelle Pineda (workshop)
Edward Wilson, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Outstanding
Wallace Alward, MD
Neil Baum, MD
Edward Buckley, MD
Jeffery Daigrepont (workshop)
Steve Gedde, MD
Davinder Grover, MD
John Hart, MD
Yuri McKee, MD
Faruk Orge, MD
Roberto Pineda, MD
Michelle Pineda (workshop)
Edward Wilson, MD
Clear selection
Audio-Visual Materials
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Official Program Booklet
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Facilities (Room/Comfort/Catering)
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
Overall Rating
Poor
1
2
3
4
Outstanding
Clear selection
The activity was effective in meeting the educational objectives
Minimally
1
2
3
4
5
Completely
Clear selection
The activity included opportunities to learn interactively from faculty/participants
Minimally
1
2
3
4
5
Completely
Clear selection
The content was useful and relevant to my practice
Minimally
1
2
3
4
5
Completely
Clear selection
Was there any evidence of commercial bias in any portion of the Symposium?
Yes
No
Clear selection
If yes, please explain
Your answer
Do you expect that the information learned during this activity will improve your judgement or skills within the next 6 months?
Definitely will not change
1
2
3
4
5
Definitely will change
Clear selection
What will you change? Please name two or more specific items.
Your answer
Compared to other meetings I have participated in over the past year, I would rate this activity as:
Needs serious improvement
1
2
3
4
5
A model of its kind
Clear selection
The most beneficial part of this CME conference was
Your answer
Suggested improvements to this CME conference are:
Your answer
Reflecting on your own practice, what practice gaps of lack of knowledge, or skills, can we help to address at future symposia? Be specific.
Your answer
Suggested topics for future meetings (general and specific)
Your answer
How did you learn about this CME conference?
Direct Mail
Journal/Calendar
Internet
Colleague
Other
Clear selection
What were your reasons for choosing this CME conference?
Your answer
Which category best describes you?
Resident
Med. School Faculty
Practicing Ophthalmologist
Allied Health Professional
Other
Clear selection
Subspecialty
Your answer
Comments
Your answer
Your name (optional)
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
