Whether you submit feedback now, or you prefer to review the presentation prior to commenting, please note that the more specific you can be, the more useful your input will be. Unlike many of our Community Meetings, this formal process is linked specifically to the presentation, and we ask that, if at all possible, you refer to a specific slide number/s when formulating your question/s.
If you attended one of our presentations of the Alternatives Analysis, and a question came to you after the meeting was over, you are not alone. If formulating a comment relies upon a clearer understanding of a design feature, a measurement or a graphic included in the presentation, we are happy to provide that clarification. With every question, we learn better ways to express the information that we do understand to this point.
As you know, we are only able to answer questions that we have been able to research. Questions that rest outside the current scope of design are no less important, but it is not helpful to speculate at this stage. As the preferred footprint becomes clearer - if a basic design alternative receives the go-ahead for future study - the funding we seek will enable Blue Coast to produce the stormwater management data requested, and fill in the blanks that still exist so that the safety of roads, wells & septic are not just answers, but actual engineered plans.
The following fields are optional for submission; whatever feedback you leave will be recorded. Your choice to view the Alternatives Analysis Review demonstrates active participation, interest and an openness to the information that has been gathered, modeled and designed at this stage. Mid Sound is interested and open to the unique perspective you bring to these alternatives.
