Transportation Group Draft Position Statement
Welcome to the Transportation Group's member survey to help us develop a position statement on transport. Members are invited to provide comment on the draft principles below.

For any questions or issues not covered in this survey, please email lead author and Central branch chair Peter Cockrem.

About the draft position statement

The draft position statement contains a set of principles helping professionals, decision-makers and the public to recognise good practice. This supports our objectives:

  • advance transport knowledge
  • develop good practice
  • improve outcomes
  • and support members

Why we are developing this

Members have asked us for support in applying professional standards to transportation, such as the Engineering NZ Code of Ethical Conduct. Professional recognition pathways to take this further are described on our Qualifications page.

We hope that developing this clarity at an institutional level will help individual members to explain best practice, and that it will empower the community and decision-makers to engage in transport challenges constructively.


Draft Professional Transport Principles

Professionalism encompasses ethics and competence – in transport as in all professional fields like law, medicine, and structural engineering.

Ethical transport work considers:

1. Honesty and preservation of health, safety, and the environment: In accordance with ENZ’s code of ethical conduct, ethical transport advice must be fair, honest, and comprehensive, putting people’s health, safety, and the environment first. It should inform people of the consequences of not following the advice.

2. Transport inclusion and engagement: Ethical advice ensures that the transport system is fair and accessible to everyone, including women, children, older people, and people with diverse backgrounds and abilities. This includes engaging with communities to understand deep underlying values and needs beyond superficial reactions, and ensuring under-represented perspectives are fairly included.

Competent transport work considers:

3. Treaty of Waitangi: Competent transport advice for Crown and local government helps them understand and fulfil their responsibility to take appropriate account of the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi – including partnership, active protection, and consultation.

4. Climate change: Competent transport advice understands how transport contributes to climate change, and how transport is exposed to its effects. In line with ENZ’s climate position, transport professionals have a key role in leading climate mitigation and adaptation.

5. Induce demand for efficient modes that use less space, resources and energy:  Competent transport advice understands that although a quality driving experience is desirable, an efficient transport system makes walking, biking, scooting and using public transport more attractive for most trips, because these consume less space, resources and energy. Induced demand means transport investment and policy decisions shape the way people want to get around.

6. Induce demand for efficient land use: Competent transport advice understands that an effective and efficient transport system makes dense and mixed land use attractive and convenient, because this enhances people’s ability to access essential services and destinations and improves transport efficiency. Evidence shows prioritising vehicular mobility has the long-term systemic effect of spreading destinations further apart, gradually worsening access. This is important for transport planning – especially in the long run – and should be a key part of all decisions.

7. Value of public space: Competent transport advice understands that public space is valuable, considers what transport options are compatible with other community functions of public space, and prioritises these appropriately in different contexts.

8. Intervention hierarchy: Competent transport advice considers improving efficiency before increasing capacity, because this is more effective and cost-efficient. The intervention hierarchy starts with reducing the need to travel by changing how land is used, improving the attractiveness of sustainable transport, and managing demand through pricing. Increasing capacity for vehicles should be our last choice after more effective and efficient options have been exhausted.

9. Risk management hierarchy: Like in industrial safety, competent transport safety advice prioritises the most effective actions: getting rid of risks, swapping risky things for safer ones, and using engineering to make unavoidable risks safer. In a risk management hierarchy, it’s a last resort to rely on rule compliance and safety equipment. This means focusing on reducing the need to drive; reducing exposure to traffic; improving public transport, walking and cycling; engineering roads and streets to reduce speeds and conflict points; reducing speed limits; and finally improving crash protection for people and vehicles.

10. Resilience takes a long-term system view: Competent transport advice considers how the transport system can proactively and reactively adapt to serve people’s needs through a wide range of probable and possible changes. This includes slow and rapid shocks that are social, economic, environmental and geopolitical in nature. Resilience should be improved in ways that are consistent with the other principles, and which increase resilience beyond transport, such as supporting transport modes and land use patterns that reduce dependence on energy and complex supply chains.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Are you currently a member of the Transportation Group?
*
Please enter the email address registered to your Transportation Group membership
*
Do you support this draft position statement overall?
Clear selection
For each draft principle, please indicate your level of support for its intent. In the next question you will be able to suggest changes to wording.
Strongly support
Support
Neutral
Oppose
Strongly oppose
1. Honesty and preservation of health, safety, and the environment
2. Transport inclusion and engagement
3. Treaty of Waitangi
4. Climate change
5. Induce demand for efficient modes that use less space, resources and energy
6. Induce demand for efficient land use
7. Value of public space
8. Intervention hierarchy
9. Risk management hierarchy
10. Resilience takes a long-term system view
Clear selection
How helpful do you think the position statement could be for each of these challenges members have reported facing?
Not helpful - something else is needed
Limited value
Moderate value
High value
N/A - have not experienced this challenge
You see ways the transport system could be improved
People regard your professional advice as a personal opinion
You feel pressure to dilute your professional advice
You are uncertain of the boundaries of industry best practice
You don't know whether your advice goes too far or not far enough
You feel like you're making a difference and improving outcomes
You wish you could make more of a difference and create better outcomes
Clear selection
Please tell us what you particularly like or dislike about any of the draft principles, and why. The more specific you can be, the better we can address your comments.
Are there other principles you would like to see included? We would like to keep the list concise, so which of the existing principles would you suggest replacing?
Finally, we have some optional questions to help put survey responses in context. 

Which sector do you work in?
Clear selection
What career stage would you consider yourself to be in?
Clear selection
Which region are you based in?
Clear selection
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy