MX Beamline at Elettra 2.0 Trieste
A new dedicated MX beamline at Elettra 2.0, μXRD, will replace the present XRD2 beamline. It  will be complemented by a new cryogenic electron microscopy facility (cryoEM) established in concert by the Italian National Research Council and Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste.  An interconnected network of support laboratories for MX and cryoEM sample preparation and characterization with ancillary analytical techniques will further widen the offer.

In order to better focus on the new characteristics and features available at the beamline, we would like to get a better understanding of what would impact and best suite your research.

We would like to encourage you to provide us with information about your present and perspective needs by taking a few minutes to respond to our survey below by April 15th 2023. Please share this link with anyone you deem appropriate.

The results of the survey will be presented at the hybrid-mode workshop Elettra 2.0: New Structural Biology Opportunities, July 3rd-4th 2023. More information on the workshop will be announced soon reaching you by e-mail.

For more info or comment please contact annie.heroux@elettra.eu

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Are you a user at the MX beamlines at Elettra
Clear selection
Are you a user at MX beamlines of other facilities? If Yes, which facilities (use "Other" field: ESRF, DLS...)
Which MX experiments do you presently do?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100 %
Standard MX (Native, SAD, MAD)
Fragment Screening
In-situ plate Screening
Serial Crystallography (SSX)
Time-Resolved Crystallography
Correlated Studies (MX, spectroscopy)
Clear selection
Which experiments do you foresee doing in the next 5 years?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100 %
Standard MX (Native, SAD, MAD)
Fragment Screening
In-situ plate Screening
Serial Crystallography (SSX)
Correlated Studies (MX + inline Spectroscopy)
Time-Resolved Crystallography
XFEL
Clear selection
Do you presently combine MX and cryoEM experiments? If YES, tell us at which facilities (use "Other" field)
Is it important to have the MX and cryoEM experiments done at the same facility?
Do you have issues sending dewars to facilities? If YES, tell us which issues (use "Other" field: cost, delays, vacuum issues...)
PRESENTLY : What beam size do you normally use
In the FUTURE: What beam size would you prefer using
Tell us what other features you would like to be available at the future uXRD beamline
Rates these features available at the beamline
not important
uselful
important
ESSENTIAL
Web applications for Remote Access
Automatic data analysis pipelines
Access to Computing
Download of individual data collection (rawdata included)
In-plate plate screening
Access to on-site sample preparation
Clear selection
Core facility
To prepare or characterise your samples for uXRD or the CryoEM facility
How important is it for you?
not important
useful
important
ESSENTIAL
Access to a core lab for sample preparation
Access to a crystallisation lab
Having a crystallisation service
Having a protein production service
Having biophysical characterization service (Quality Control)
Access to a core lab for grid preparation (cryoEM)
Clear selection
Please enter your affiliation and we would appreciate your full email
If you have any questions please contact annie.heroux@elettra.eu
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms