Protocol Coverage Proposal Form
This is a form for protocols themselves to display interest that they would like to be supported on Cover Protocol. Please only use this form if you are a team member of the protocol being requested.

NOTE: Submitting through this form does not guarantee the protocol submitted will supported by Cover Protocol, this is primarily to gather required information directly from interested protocols!
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Protocol Name *
Main Protocol Website *
Protocol Summary *
Are you part of the team of the protocol? *
Protocol Risks *
Please explain where the risks of your users are mainly concerned. Including who has control (multi-sigs, DAOs, etc.) and what is capable from the entity capable of control/modification. This is where your users should be convinced that coverage is valuable for them and the protocol.
How can we reach your protocols team? *
What is your protocols current TVL? *
Protocol Age *
What type of application is the protocol? *
What is your protocols GitHub? *
Is your protocol audited? *
Link to relevant audits (if applicable)
Link to your logo *
Square logo please
Link to banner of protocol name *
A banner is a rectangular image of your protocol name (can include logo as well)
Can your protocol offer a bonus token for shield mining rewards (in any token, even WETH) to attract coverage? This is recommended in any amount. *
Read more about the bonus token program here: https://app.gitbook.com/@cover-protocol/s/docs/collaboration/bonus
If you can add shield mining rewards, what can you provide? How many tokens?
Preferred Collateral *
Recommendation: a yield earning collateral will attract more liquidity for coverage of your protocol.
Preferred expiration *
Will you become a Market Maker (MM) and/or Coverage Provider (CP)? *
Recommendation: using the majority of the fund to be a Market Maker to allow users to have access to liquidity. Then, using the rest of the fund to be a CP to decrease the cost of the coverage, aka CLAIM tokens.
If yes to the above, how much in funds could your protocol provide?
Recommendation: using the majority of the fund to be a Market Maker to allow users to have access to liquidity. (Market making has minimal risk if there is no incident!) Then, using the rest of the fund to be a CP to decrease the cost of the coverage, aka CLAIM tokens. Funds used to coverage provide have 0 loss unless there is a hack!
Deployment cost (3 ETH) is required for your protocol to be listed (3 contracts + 2 balancer pools). *
Comments
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms