UNITID Course/ Lecturer Evaluation
The purpose of this evaluation is to provide feedback about the course /course facilities and the lecturer which will help in the development of more effective tuition for this course at the University. Please rate the statements given by circling the appropriate score as per the following scale:

1 = Poor 2 = Reasonable   3 = satisfactory   4 = Good 5 = Very good 6. N/A = Not applicable

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Course Title *
Instructor
A. Objectives *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A Not Applicable
Clarity of course objectives (Classroom/Clinical)
Achievement of Course Objectives
Relevance of course to programme objectives
Content and methodology *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Interpretation of concepts and theories
Coverage of course syllabus
Clarity in presentation
Effectiveness of presentation methods
Materials and Physical Facilities *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Sufficiency of handouts
Value of recommended resource materials
Use of audio-visual and other teaching aids
Guidance on the use of web based material / journals
Adequacy of physical facilities
Sufficiency of computer (ICT) facility
Relevance of laboratory experiments (if any)
Evaluation *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Relevance and usefulness of assignments/practicals / CATs
Appropriate coursework assessment
17. Satisfaction with methods of evaluation for Classroom Theory
17. Satisfaction with methods of evaluation for Practicals
Availability of lecturer *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Attends class regularly
Keeps to the published timetable
Is available for consultation when necessary (outside class time)
For guidance in practical sessions (e.g. Nursing)
Preparation *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = |Not Applicable
Explains the scope, recommended readings, delivery and evaluation methodology of the course
Uses organized, up-to-date notes and course materials
Uses update material with general / industrial practice
Manages time well (punctual, uses class time efficiently)
Demonstration of procedures in the practical sessions
Course Delivery *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Presents course concepts and theories in a clear and interesting way
Facilitates meaningful and active class participation by students
Answers questions clearly and knowledgeably
Uses relevant examples and illustrations in the class / practical
Is open to diverse viewpoints and opinions
Course Evaluation *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Gives relevant and challenging assignments and tests
Marks assignments and tests promptly
Gives helpful feedback on assignments and tests
Use of case studies for analysis
Overall Rating *
Poor
Reasonable
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
N/A = Not Applicable
Overall rating of lecturer - Classroom/Lecture
Overall rating of lecturer - Practical/Clinical
Class attendance *
100%
75 - 99%
50-74%
Below 49%
What proportion of classes do you attend? (tick appropriately)
In a normal class/practical session, what portion of class members are present? (tick appropriately)
What are the reasons for the level of class attendance that you have reported above? *
39. Your lecturer would like to know if there are certain aspects you believe he/she has done especially well in his/her teaching of this course? *
40. Your lecturer would also like to know what specific things you believe must be done to improve his/her teaching in this course? *
41. What other materials or resources, if any, should be added to enhance understanding of the course contents? *
42. What is your overall view of the course? *
43. Would you recommend this course to any other group of students? *
Required
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of University of Nairobi. Report Abuse
Google Forms