Your say in the new era

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Last year the Auxilium project had (more than average) struggles.

In 2017 the Sprouts cryptocurrency community was rescued from the team who abandoned them twice. After about 6 months of development we launched the Auxilium blockchain in 2018 and got listed on Mercatox (which cost 3.5 BTC at the time).

The team was small, and still learning about the crypto space. In the meanwhile we're 4 years (3.5 years from official launch) further and we've learned so much more than we could've imagined. We also learned that outstanding quality doesn't guarantee listings, and that maintaining your own blockchain (company) - with the many advantages it has - is costly (both in money and time).

Patience was and is one of the keywords. Remember when nearly everyone shouted that BTC would hit 100,000 USD by the end of 2021...? Well that didn't happen, and maybe it won't even in 2022. This is just one small example about the complexity and newness of it all.

The past few months Anton and James, the co-founders of Auxilium, decided that a big change is needed to move on. This means being more flexible in the way the company is operated. A more community-based and open-source idea, with concessions left and right, and probably rethinking all strategies, is what the new era stands for. Or should stand for.

With this form we want to involve you in the next steps we take.
Please fill in this form before 1st February 2022. After this date we'll summarise the outcome and stick with a direction for the new era.

NO PRIVATE INFORMATION WILL BE SHARED!

Email *

I've been an AUX holder for *

Less than 1 year

Between 1 and 2 years

Between 2 and 3 years

Between 3 and 4 years

I'm a former SPRTS holder, and entered the swap from SPRTS to AUX

I'm holding ... AUX

0-1000

1001-10000

10001-100000

100001-1000000

More than 1000000

Clear selection

I think we should do everything to keep the Auxilium blockchain running *

Yes, even if this means the current struggles/bottlenecks remain

No, if Auxilium can leverage a different blockchain by creating a Native Token we should do so

We should have a completely clean start (delisting old exchange, swapping to different coin or token) *

Yes

If there is a swap we should have a capped swap (meaning whales can't swap all AUX) *

Yes, this is better for an even distribution of coins and would be more attractive for new investors

No, holders should be able to swap all AUX held

I think whales should be able to swap ... AUX if we swap *

100000 or less

500000 or less

1000000 or less

All

I think smart contracts are a must *

Yes

In terms of philosophy we should focus on ... *

Charity

NFT

DeFi

Other:

A rebranding is a must *

Yes

Yes, I like the logo in the header of this form

When it comes to business Auxilium should focus most on ... *

Marketing

Exchanges

Building a Team

Raising Capital

Other:

When we have a clean start (with a swap and delisting current exchanges) I think we should hold an IDO or IEO for AUX *

Yes

The interest distributed monthly should stay the same *

Yes

No, it should be lower

No, it should be higher

We should only use one blockchain, and not leverage multiple decentralised exchanges (PancakeSwap, UniSwap, etc.) *

Yes, otherwise people will have to swap all the time

No, it's a good idea to have more liquidity and reach

The AUXL token idea and use-ability should be skipped and we should totally focus on AUX (only using AUX for all use cases)

Yes

Clear selection

The people who entered the airdrop should receive AUX, even if we stop with AUXL

Yes

Clear selection

The thing I like the most about AUX *

The thing I dislike the most about AUX *

Additional comments or ideas

We want you to know that a potential (temporary) swap doesn't mean Auxilium technology will disappear for ever. Once we grow we can always move back to the costly original blockchain. *

I understand

Required

Send me a copy of my responses.

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

reCAPTCHA

Privacy Terms

This form was created inside of BijlesGezocht. Report Abuse

Forms