JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Continuing Excellence - Course Evaluation Form
Course Name: Working with Persons with Special Needs in Forensic Settings
Date: November 30, 2021
Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Explain the components of the RNR framework.
2) Describe how programs often don’t adhere effectively to the responsivity principle with special-needs clients.
3) Explain the challenges faced by clients with special needs in obtaining effective correctional interventions.
4) Appraise the potential utility assessment, treatment, and risk management strategies used in their jurisdictions.
5) Outline and recommend important modifications to existing practices so as to ensure the overall responsivity experience of clients with special needs.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Email
*
Your email
Last Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate)
*
Your answer
First Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate)
*
Your answer
License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)
Your answer
Issuing state/province, if applicable
Your answer
Which of the following best describes you?
*
Choose
Psychologist
Social Worker
Counselor
None of the above
Would you like to receive a certificate of completion from Continuing Excellence?
*
For more information, please refer to
https://safersocietypress.org/working-with-persons-with-special-needs-in-forensic-settings/
Choose
Yes
No
I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
*
I agree
Required
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
*
5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
5
4
3
2
1
2. Rate the quality of the program content
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
*
5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5
4
3
2
1
5. Rate the instructor(s) knowledge and expertise of the subject
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
6. Rate the instructor(s) teaching ability
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
*
Learning Objective #1: "Explain the components of the RNR framework," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
5
4
3
2
1
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
*
Learning Objective #2: "Describe how programs often don’t adhere effectively to the responsivity principle with special-needs clients," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
5
4
3
2
1
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
*
Learning Objective #3: "Explain the challenges faced by clients with special needs in obtaining effective correctional interventions," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
5
4
3
2
1
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
*
Learning Objective #4: "Appraise the potential utility assessment, treatment, and risk management strategies used in their jurisdictions," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
5
4
3
2
1
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
*
Learning Objective #5: "Outline and recommend important modifications to existing practices so as to ensure the overall responsivity experience of clients with special needs," 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
5
4
3
2
1
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials)
*
5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
5
4
3
2
1
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online).
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested.
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
N/A
5
4
3
2
1
12. Rate the ease of the registration process
*
5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
5
4
3
2
1
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
14. Rate the program staff's responsiveness to questions
*
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5
4
3
2
1
15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future?
*
Your answer
16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material?
*
Your answer
17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better?
*
Your answer
18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)?
*
Your answer
19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training?
Your answer
20. OPTIONAL: What country are you from?
Your answer
21. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you'd like to share with us?
Your answer
Send me a copy of my responses.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
Privacy
Terms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
