RAUF DENKTAS UNIVERSITY STUDENT EVALUATION OF THE COURSE AND TEACHING
Instructions:
• This evaluation is part of our continuous effort to maintain academic and administrative quality.
• Please note that the results of this evaluation will be available to the instructor only AFTER final course grades have been submitted.
• We take your answers seriously, and we hope you will also take this survey seriously.
• Please write comments to explain your scores.

Thank you for participating in this evaluation.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Student Demographic Information
Sex
Clear selection
Country
A. Course evaluation - ITEC101 Introduction to Information Technology I
*
A
B
C
D
F
Course outline matches course objectives and requirements of the course
Course outline is strictly followed
All topics indicated in the course outline are covered
Methods of evaluation (e.g. assignments, tests, etc.) reflects the subject matter
Instructional materials (readings, audio-visual materials, etc.) help learning
Instructional activities (lectures, labs, tutorials, etc.) help learning
Level of difficulty of the course material is reasonable
Volume of the work required in the course is reasonable
The value of the overall learning experience was…
B. The instructor: Cemal OSmanlılar
*
A
B
C
D
F
Follows the plan for the course as written in the course outline
Explains the grading system clearly, i.e. weights and content of each assessment
Explains the aims of each topic before lecturing
Is accessible to students out of class during office hours
Speaks in a manner that is easy to understand
Encourages students to ask questions
Comes to class in time (not late)
Does not leave the class early, i.e. uses all the time
Is always prepared for the lesson s/he teachesGoes over the points again to ensure that students understand the lesson
Goes over the points again to ensure that students understand the lesson
Gives examinations that cover the topics lectured in class
Evaluates exams and assignments and returns them in time
Gives assignments and exams that are reasonable in length and difficulty
Grades exam papers, homework and projects fairly and impartially
The overall effectiveness of the instructor was…
Comments
1. What do you like best about this course?
2. What would you like to change about the course?
3. What are the instructor's strengths (good aspects)?
4. What suggestions do you have to improve the instructor's teaching?
5. Other comments *
C. Course Learning Outcomes (knowledge, skills and competences expected to be      achieved at the end of the semester).
*
A
B
C
D
F
Synthesize the use of drawing to express or present ideas in two/three-dimensional freehand drawings, also incorporating the use of colour/shading techniques.
To develop basic understanding of the geometric shapes and spatial awareness.
To gain Knowledge and skills in the use of basic tools, techniques, and processes in relation to freehand sketching to simplify the process of creating design ideas.
To Demonstrate basic architectural communication skills in 2d, 3d, oral and written communication methods.
To Demonstrate an understanding of basic perspective theory, the ability to think graphically and utilise drawing as a language of communication.
To Demonstrate architectural drawing skills in 2D and 3D including freehand drawing, diagramming, brainstorm sketching to convey design ideas.
D. Self-Reflection
*
A
B
C
D
F
My attendance
My level of English to follow the course
My current Grade Point Average (GPA)
My expected grade in this course
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Rauf Denktas University. Report Abuse
Google Forms