Perceptions and Trust in NATO from the university students of Romania and Türkiye

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Disclaimer: This questionnaire is anonymous. Your responses will be treated confidentially and used exclusively for research purposes. We have no means of identifying individual respondents based on their answers. Participation is entirely voluntary. Thank you for taking part in this study.

1. Country of origin *

Romania

Turkey

Other:

2. Field of study *

International Relations

Political Science

Diplomacy

Economics

Other:

3. How would you rate your country of origin membership in NATO structures? *

Too involved.

Suitably involved.

Slightly involved.

Not at all.

Other:

4. How would you rate your country of origin involvement in NATO's response in the Ukraine crisis? *

Too involved.

Suitably involved.

Slightly involved.

Not at all involved.

Other:

5. Did the Ukrainian crisis changed your perception towards NATO? *

Yes, radically.

Yes, very much.

Yes, moderately.

Maybe.

No, not all.

6. If your perception has changed, which were the determining factors: *

The lack of a coordinated response among the NATO members.

The Ukraine crisis portrays prior existing divisions among NATO members.

The provisions for ground forces experienced a delayed response.

Creates the potential for unwanted escalation of the crisis.

Creates the potential for unwanted escalation of aggression in neighboring states.

Other:

Required

7. NATO's handling of the crisis might create an avenue for opportunistic actors stepping in. *

Yes

Maybe

8. If your answer to the previous question was yes, please provide examples of such actors *

9. Do you trust NATO? *

Yes, absolutely.

Yes, moderately.

No.

Other:

11. Do you trust the current potential of NATO to... *

Maintain stability.

Protect and assist its member states.

Provide solutions for other crises.

Create the necessary framework needed for further enlargement.

Engage in dialogue before resorting to other instruments to solve crises.

To successfully solve the Ukrainian crisis.

To aggravate the current Ukrainian crisis.

To accentuate the cleavage between the NATO member states towards the manangement of Ukrianian crisis.

Other:

Required

12. In the future, NATO's presence should be... *

Symbolic.

Limited.

Restricted.

Only under the auspices of cooperation with other actors.

Enhanced.

Other:

13. Considering (before and after) NATO's response in the Ukrainian crisis your level of trust *

Increased substentially.

Increased moderately.

Remained the same.

Decreased moderately.

Decreased substentially.

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Forms