Q9. I have deliberately made FemScale scores easily convertible to the original FPS-2 (Henley et al., 1998) which it is based on. Should we keep doing this? Or, do you think it is better to update and improve FemScale to reflect more modern and contemporary feminist ideas and values? FPS-2 is (well, at least "was" in 1998) somewhat reliable, and there are quite a few reports and papers that are based on FPS-2. We also can't do controlled tests like Henley. But the Scale hasn't aged too well to say the least. There are also questions that are less reliable than other, but the overall score does not reflect these differences. 元にした論文(Henley, 1998)やそれを受けて書かれた報告と比較できるようにすべきですか？現時点では、これらと比較しやすいように、原則として質問や配点方法をあまり変えていません。しかし、実際には、回答と被験者の思想の相関が低く、あまり信頼性のない質問も含まれています。また、フェミニズムとしても1998年からは様々な考えや視点が変わっているため、これらを反映する必要がある気もしています。
