MergeBase is developing resources to help DevSecOps handle the problem of prioritizing application security tools as they build out their tech stacks. Please take the following 2-minute survey to share your thoughts on prioritizing application security tools.
(Feel free to share this survey with your colleagues—the more responses, the more useful the results will be!)
In a perfect world, every application would launch with flawless original code built on flawless third-party libraries—but that’s not the world we live in. Instead, DevSecOps teams rely on tools to detect vulnerabilities in their original, licensed, and open-source code. These tools include:
Static Application Security Testing (SAST), which finds security threats in your source code before it goes live.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), which finds vulnerabilities in your running application.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA), which finds known vulnerabilities in your open-source code.
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP), which analyzes a running application’s user behavior to detect and mitigate real-time threats.
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), which scans elements of your code for vulnerabilities as they are being tested.
It’s rarely practical for DevSecOps teams to have all five of these tools implemented at launch. So which tools should take priority?