SRCLD 2025 CONFERENCE EVALUATION
Please complete the following evaluation. Your responses help us continue to improve SRCLD and are essential for our NIH progress reports. The evaluation response form will remain open until June 15, 2025.
Thank you for your participation!
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Overall, the SRCLD conference was a valuable, scientific, and professional-development experience for me. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
The conference venue was accessible, appropriate, and adequate for the meeting. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
The conference daily events were organized in a logical and efficient manner. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
The online schedule and digital program contents (information, layout, organization) were informative and useful. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
The SRCLD website (functionality, information, organization) was user-friendly and informative. *
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
The presenters used time efficiently.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
The presenters demonstrated thorough knowledge of their subject.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
The topics covered reflected my professional needs.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
The content of the symposium met my expectations.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Clear selection
Comments about specific presenters:
What were the major strengths of the symposium?
What were the major weaknesses of the symposium?
Recommended topics or speakers for future meetings:
My primary occupation is: *
Required
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms