Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
We hope to compile these responses into a video and event specific printable handouts, with the potential for more formats in the future.
These guides will not have the rules of the event, or put forth a specific paradigm on how to evaluate the event; the goal is to supplement those existing resources from institutions like the NSDA.
The goal of this training guide is to educate judges at all experience levels on how to combat their implicit biases and prejudices when evaluating speech and debate events.
You do not have to answer every question! There is no min/max word count here and all responses are anonymous.
Which events is this applicable to:
What would you like to see included in such guides pertaining to SPEECH CONTENT?
What would you like to see included in such guides pertaining to DELIVERY?
What would you like to see included in such guides pertaining to PRESENTATION?
What would you like to see included in such guides pertaining to FEEDBACK?
Are there any example situations you would like to include to further your point?
Do you have any preferences for the format of these resources (e.g. video length, interactive content, tone)?
Next
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy