PHIL 1800 Library Session: Background Information
Find 2 sources of background information relevant to your question using the library resources presented during this session. Then answer the questions below by skimming or selectively reading the background information entries.

There are 18 total. You will have about 25 minutes to work on this exercise initially. There will be have time at the end of the session to complete it if needed.

Once you submit form, you will be emailed a copy of your responses. Use whichever email address you prefer and can easily access later on in this session.
登入 Google 即可儲存進度。瞭解詳情
電子郵件 *
Background Information: Source 1
1.  Where did you find it? (E.g., Oxford Bibliographies, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, etc.) *
2.  Give the title and author (E.g., "Space and Time" by Alasdair Richmond) *
3.  Is there evidence in this entry that your research question or a closely related question was discussed before 2009 (i.e., in the past)? *
4.  If yes, list 1 piece of information the entry gives about how the question was discussed before 2009.
5.  If included in the entry, list the names of up to 5 philosophers mentioned who wrote about your question or closely related ones before 2009.
6.  Is there evidence in the entry that your question or a closely related one is being discussed in the present (since 2009)? *
7.  If yes, list 1 piece of information the entry gives about how the question is currently being discussed (between 2009 and today).
8.  If included in the entry, list the names of up to 5 philosophers mentioned who has written about your question or closely related ones since 2009.
Background Information: Source 2
9.  Where did you find it? (E.g., Oxford Bibliographies, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, etc.) *
10.  Give the title and author (E.g., "Space and Time" by Alasdair Richmond) *
11.  Is there evidence in this entry that your research question or a closely related question was discussed before 2009 (i.e., in the past)? *
12.  If yes, list 1 piece of information the entry gives about how the question was discussed before 2009.
13.  If included in the entry, list the names of up to 5 philosophers mentioned who wrote about your question or closely related ones before 2009.
14.  Is there evidence in the entry that your question or a closely related one is being discussed in the present (since 2009)? *
15.  If yes, list 1 piece of information the entry gives about how the question is currently being discussed (between 2009 and today).
16.  If included in the entry, list the names of up to 5 philosophers mentioned who have written about your question or closely related ones since 2009.
Comparing Background Information Sources
17.  Did you notice any overlap in the philosophers mentioned by by these 2 sources of background information? *
18.  If yes, list the names of up to 5 philosophers you saw mentioned in both entries.
系統會透過電子郵件將你的作答內容複本傳送到你所提供的地址。
提交
清除表單
請勿利用 Google 表單送出密碼。
reCAPTCHA
隱私權條款
Google 並未認可或建立這項內容。 檢舉濫用情形 - 服務條款 - 隱私權政策
Google 表單