JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Ethics Back-evaluation of peer reviewer
Use this form to evaluate the usefulness of each peer review you received of your paper.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Your animal name on this paper.
*
Choose
Alligator
Alpaca
Baboon
Badger
Bear
Bee
Boa
Buzzard
Capybara
Caribou
Chimpanzee
Chinchilla
Cobra
Crow
Egret
Falcon
Ferret
Fowl
Fox
Frog
Goat
Gull
Hare
Hawk
Heron
Jellyfish
Kangaroo
Lark
Mackerel
Marmoset
Marten
Mastodon
Meadowlark
Meerkat
Mosquito
Newt
Okapi
Orca
Ostrich
Panda
Peafowl
Pelican
Platypus
Ptarmigan
Scorpion
Stork
Sturgeon
Tahr
Tapir
Tiglon
Tucana
Wasp
Zebu
The Saint who reviewed you:
*
Choose
Abakuh
Adalgott
Agnes
Ahijah the Shilonite
Ahmad Zarruq
Al-Busiri
Alexis Falconieri
Amir Khusrau
Amoz
Baldred of Tyninghame
Basil the Fool for Christ
Basil the Great
Christina the Astonishing
Colette
Cynllo
Drona
Eliezer son of Dodavahu
Elisha
Euphrosyne of Alexandria
Gad
Genevieve
Isaiah
Jacob
Jami
Joan of Arc
Joel
John Baptist de La Salle
Kochchenganan
Machar
Mian Mir
Michaiah son of Imlah
Navnath
Nayanars
Neriah
Osyth
Pir Yemeni
Rimbert of Turholt
Rose of Lima
Salvius
Sambandar
Samuel
Shastriji Maharaj
Soch Kraal
Solomon
Sufi Barkat Ali
Sultan Bahu
Sultan Walad
Telli Baba
Thomas Aquinas
Uriah
Vanavasa
Waris Ali Shah
Yusuf Hamdani
How useful were the comments from this reviewer?
*
Not useful at all
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely useful and helpful
Comment for your reviewer: What they did well and what they could do better.
*
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
