Spring 2024: Course Evaluation Survey (Pre-EOSA)

Purpose and Scope:
The purpose of the Students’ Course Evaluation Survey is to gather data and insights from students regarding their experiences and perceptions of a course and its delivery each semester. The scope of the survey assesses course content, course learning outcomes, teaching methods, learning resources, assessments and feedback, and the learning environment. The feedback aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching methods, content relevance and quality of the course to ultimately contribute to an enhanced learning experience for current and future students.

Instructions: Please select the most appropriate response on each scale that best describes your experience in this course. The anonymity of respondents is guaranteed.

Please select the appropriate option below:

5 - Strongly Agree (SA)
4 - Agree (A)

3 - Neutral (N)

2 - Disagree (D)
1 - Strongly Disagree (SD)
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Select Your Lecturer *
Indicate Your Course *
The lecturer communicated the Course Learning Objectives (CLOs) effectively.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The assigned reading materials and resources were relevant and enhanced my
understanding of the topics.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The assessments given were directly aligned with the course learning outcomes.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The assessments and examinations were clear and aligned to the topics and course learning outcomes.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The course workload was reasonable and contributed to achieving the course learning outcomes.
 *
Strong Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer provided clear explanations of what was expected in terms of performance and grading criteria for the course.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer explained course content in a way I could understand.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer presented the course material in an organised and coherent manner.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer used a diverse range of teaching methods (e.g. visual aids, group activities, real-world examples) to facilitate my understanding.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer actively engaged the class through discussions, activities, or examples.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer was accessible and approachable for consultation or for clarification.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The feedback provided by the lecturer helped me in my learning.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
The lecturer responded to students’ questions and concerns in a timely and helpful manner.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Disagree (SA)
The lecturer created a respectful and inclusive learning environment for all students.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
Based on my experience with this course, I would recommend this lecturer to other students.
 *
Strongly Disagree (SD)
Strongly Agree (SA)
Next
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of The University of the Commonwealth. Report Abuse
Google Forms