Feedback on DuBay, Palmer, and Piland         Global inequity in scientific names and who they honor
Thank you for reading our manuscript! We invite you to share any feedback below.

By pre-printing our work, we acknowledge that much of scientific publishing is influenced by biases, elitism, and gate-keeping.

Therefore, we hope to provide an alternate mode of participation, and a space for broader engagement with the topics covered in the paper.

We recognize that in publicly discussing work, a level of anonymity may be necessary and/or desired (responses below can be anonymous if you choose).

We will discuss every comment among the three of us, and we will do our best to respond to your comment if requested.

Additionally, if people would like to engage further in a conversation with us, we are hoping to create a working group to explore different perspectives and future directions related to the paper.

This form is another place where folks can express their desire to get involved.

We will engage in good faith and expect others to do the same.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Please share any feedback (in whichever language you wish) that you have on the manuscript (these responses will only be seen by the manuscript co-authors):
May we contact you to discuss your feedback?
Clear selection
Would you be interested in any future conversations related to this manuscript? For example, forming a working group to address follow-up questions.
Clear selection
If yes to either of the questions above, please enter your name and email below (note, if you would like your feedback to remain anonymous, please submit your name and email in a separate response):
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy