6. Whether curriculum provided the knowledge regarding usage of modern tools such as simulations / software etc. *
7. Is there adequate scope for skill development in the curriculum? *
8. Did the institution enrich the course?(Supportive theory and practicals) *
9. Is there adequate emphasis on human values, ethics and professionalism? *
10. Is there adequate emphasis on communication skills and personality development? *
11. Whether there is scope for exploration of practical skills acquired? (Research projects/ exhibition) *
12. Whether the internal (examination) assessment process is clearly described and unbiased. *
13. Whether co-curricular and extracurricular activities are being organized? *
14. The program outcomes are sufficient to meet the employment needs. *
15. Whether assistance for employability is provided by the Industry Institute Partnership and Entrepreneurship cell and Intellectual Property Rights Cell. *
16. Whether measures to improve the academic performance of slow learners is being implemented. *
17. Whether coaching for competitive examinations are provided? *
18. Whether parent-teacher meetings were being conducted. *
19. Whether suggestions (if any) received by parents are being taken into consideration for enrichment of the program. *