JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
MoSeq2-Notebook Feedback Form
This form contains questions about your user experience while using the MoSeq Jupyter Notebooks. All answers will be factored into the development of MoSeq before it is publicly released.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Email
*
Your email
The setup instructions were easy to follow
*
Very Hard
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Easy
Moseq2-App was easy to install and start up
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I experienced minimal difficulties going through the README file.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Please describe any bugs or difficulties you experienced in the setup process
Your answer
The Main Notebook guidelines were informative and easy to follow
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Strongly Agree
Please describe any points in the Main Notebook that were confusing.
Your answer
The visual aids were intuitive and helped validate each step's results
*
Not Intuitive
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Intuitive
The notebooks are very well organized
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Strongly Agree
I found the progress recovery (convenience cells) very useful.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Strongly Agree
How large was your dataset (number of sessions)
*
1-5
5-10
10-20
20-40
40+
Other:
The extraction step went smoothly (with minimal user intervention)
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Other:
The interactive ROI detection tool was helpful
*
Very Unhelpful
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Helpful
Any requested clarifications or additions to the Interactive ROI Tool?
Your answer
Please describe any bugs or difficulties you experienced in the extraction step.
Your answer
The extraction validation step was easy to understand
*
Very Complicated
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Easy
The PCA step executed with no problems
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Other:
The PCA step pathologies and solutions were helpful and informative.
*
Very Unhelpful
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Helpful
Please describe any bugs or difficulties you experienced in the PCA step.
Your answer
The ARHMM groups are well defined and easy to set.
*
Hard to Understand
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Easy to Understand
The ARHMM model training cell was easy to use
*
Hard to Use
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Easy to Use
Please describe any bugs or difficulties you experienced in the modeling step.
Your answer
The Interactive Model Results Notebook was easy to use.
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
The Interactive model results visualizations are informative
*
Not informative at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very informative
Please describe any bugs or difficulties you experienced in the Interactive Model Results Notebook
Your answer
Please list any visualization tools (types of graphs, certain modeling information) that you felt were missing from the notebook
*
Your answer
The Model Results Extension Notebook was easy to follow
Very Hard to Follow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Easy to Follow
Clear selection
What parts of the Model-Results-Extension Notebook were unclear, or could use more documentation?
Your answer
Please describe any issues you experienced in the Extension Notebook
Your answer
The Flip Classifier Training Notebook was easy to use
Very Difficult
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Easy
Clear selection
Please describe any points where you were confused in the Flip Classifier Notebook
Your answer
The notebooks were easy to navigate between
Difficult
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Easy
Clear selection
General comments?
Your answer
Send me a copy of my responses.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
Privacy
Terms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
