Intro Program Evaluation Form Spring
Evaluation forms are an essential component of our Continuing Education programming and approval and are a much appreciated part of our program review process. All participants are asked to complete evaluation forms. For the narrative questions, if a question does not apply, please type in NA. Your responses are anonymous and your emails are not tracked. The email accounts are used simply to ensure that you do not complete this form more than one time; however, you will be able to return to the form at any time to edit your responses. We greatly appreciate your help in improving our programs. If you have any questions, email the center administrator, Charla Malamed, at mrcinfo@mitchellrelationalcenter.org.
Program *
Semester *
Required
Weeks 12: Intergration & Clinical Implications, Lauren Levine, PhD and Anita Herron, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
Row 1
Weeks 13 & 14: Multiplicity & Dissociation; Trauma, Jody Davies, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
How well did this class introduce you to the concepts of self state multiplicity and dissociation?
How well did this class introduce you to the theoretical and clinical underpinnings of the relational position?
Weeks 15 & 16: Race, Class, and Identity, Melanie Suchet, PhD & Kirkland Vaughans, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
To learn how racial enactments occur in clinical spaces, and how inevitable they are.
To explore different ways of dealing with racial enactments, and understanding the therapists role in the co-creation of the enactment.
To explore how class is a silent and hidden form of identity that intersects with race in complex ways.
Week 17: Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma, Jill Salberg, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
Participants will be able to identify transgenerational themes of trauma transmissions in patient material and ways to engage the patient in working on healing and transforming these legacies.
Week 18: On Relationality: Psychoanalysis & Caribbean Perspectives, Michelle Stephens, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I now better understand the similarities and differences between Caribbean and psychoanalytic understandings of relationality.
Weeks 19 & 20: Intersubjectivity; The Analytic Third, Jessica Benjamin, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I have learned how to apply the concepts of intersubjectivity regarding enactment and dissociation to my clinical practice
I have learned how to work with building the Third in the analytic space.
Week 21: Impasse and Enactment, Janine de Peyer, LCSW *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I understand the difference between enactment and impasse.
I understand the importance of analyzing the analyst's unconscious contribution toward enactments.
Week 22: Community Psychoanalysis, Rossanna Echegoyén, LCSW *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I understand how intersubjectivity and mutuality are key relational concepts that work in tandem with concepts of collaboration and the moveable frame in community psychoanalysis.
I understand that community psychoanalysis is a mode of praxis (action) as a collective intervention in the community.w 7
I understand that my professional identity and subjectivity in community psychoanalysis is imperative when working with individuals and families in low-income communities as it relates to intersectional social identities (race, class, culture, ethnicity and gender).
Week 23: Shame, Lauren Levine, PhD and Anita Herron, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
After participating in this module, I am better able to understand the complexity and challenges of working with shame in the transference/ countertransference.
Week 24: The Verbal/Nonverbal Question, Lisa Director, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This module gave me a perspective on language, and its components, that encompassed both nonverbal and verbal dimensions.
Week 25: The Analytic Relationship, Tony Bass, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I am able to identify and compare different ways of using themselves in the therapeutic situation, involving direct and indirect uses of countertransference.
I am able to describe and identify a variety of ways of gaining access to and making use of their countertransference to benefit psychotherapeutic work with difficult, disturbing and/or challenging patients.
**Week 26: The Analyst's Self-Care, Adrienne Harris, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This module helped me to understand a number of different tools and methods for analytic self care that does not compromise the care of the analysand.
Week 27: Mother-Infant Communication and the Origins of Attachment: Implications for Adult Treatment, Beatrice Beebe, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
Week 28: Gender, Sandy Silverman, LCSW *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I am able to recognize that psychic pain can be expressed in both normative and non-normative expressions of gender.
I now understand the importance of deeply exploring my countertransference when working with trans and non-binary patients.
Week 29: Sexuality, Avgi Saketopoulou, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I am now able to explain how the concept of infantile sexuality helps us understand and work with gender and sexuality more capaciously in the consulting room
Week 30: Termination, Lauren Levine, PhD and Anita Herron, PhD *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Not Applicable
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This module helped me understand a more nuanced and mutual relational perspective on termination.
OVERALL LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR FALL SEMESTER *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
After completing the fall semester, I can describe, compare, and contrast the essential contributions of the theorists whose work has been covered so far.
After completing the fall semester, I have a deeper understanding of the historical course of the theoretical debates that have culminated in the development of Relational Psychoanalysis.
After completing the fall semester, I can evaluate and assess for myself which theoretical models are more compatible with my own thinking and the usefulness of these ideas for contemporary clinical work.
What, for you, was the highlight of this semester?
If you were to change anything, what would it be?  
What was most effective?
What was least effective?
What is your overall impression of the technological aspects of virtual Zoom setup and experience?
What is your overall impression of the registration process?
If you participated in a seminar that included those who attended remotely, what was your experience of that?
Are there any other comments you would like to share with us?
Would you recommend this seminar to a friend / colleague?
Clear selection
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Stephen Mitchell Relational Study Center. Report Abuse
Google Forms