U2FP 2022 Science and Advocacy Symposium Survey

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Thank you for participating in our event survey. Your input will help us improve future conferences and provide important feedback on the work of Unite 2 Fight Paralysis. Please write your responses for each session that you attend.

Tip: for easy access, keep the survey open in a separate tab throughout the symposium. That way, you can continually add your rating for each presentation.

I am *

An individual living with paralysis

A family member of someone with paralysis

A caregiver to someone with paralysis

A clinician serving individuals with paralysis

A research scientist

A representative of an SCI organization, foundation or agency

A representative of industry: biotech, pharma, device or company serving individuals with paralysis

Other:

I was introduced to U2FP and the Science and Advocacy Symposium through:

U2FP web page, email, or member

Referral from a family member or friend

Referral from a medical professional

Internet search engine

Social media

New Mobility magazine

Other:

Clear selection

Rating for the livestream conference platform (if applicable)

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Compare this year's in person conference to previous years' virtual conferences

I prefer this year's in person conference over the virtual conference

I prefer the virtual conference over this year's in person conference?

I prefer the in-person meeting with the option to livestream

Other:

Clear selection

Rating for Matthew Rodreick's "SCI Translational Wheel"

Please rate each of the presentations you attend.

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Dennis Bourbeau's Challenges and Opportunities in the Translation Pipeline for SCI Medicine Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Quinn Brett's "The Great Divide" Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Brett, Bourbeau, Rodreick Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Cedric Geoffroy's The Importance of the Age Factor After Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Candace Floyd's Key Variables that Affect the Clinical Relevance of SCI Preclinical Studies Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Geoffroy and Floyd Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Paul Corson's Innovation Management - Maximizing the Commercial Impact of University Inventiveness Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Florian Solzbacher's “It Won’t Work”: The Perception Challenge Facing Commercial BCIs Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Nana Collett's Industry Perspective on Developing a Therapeutic for Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Corson, Solzbacher and Collett Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Dale Hull's Who Needs Outpatient Rehab Anyway? Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Dale Hull Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Kelsey Peterson's Documentary Move Me

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Move Me Panel Discussion with Brett, Peterson, Stoffer

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for the Networking Reception

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Lana Zholudeva's Bridging the Translational Gap through Effective Communication Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Monica Perez A Novel Approach to Target Functional Restoration after Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Wolfram Tetzlaff's Neuroprotection after Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Perez, Silver, Zholudeva Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Reggie Edgerton's Exposure of Unrecognized Systemic Adaptive Physiological Mechanisms has Provided a Robust Platform for Greater Recovery Post Paralysis Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Susie Harkema's Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for David Darrow's Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Synergies after Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Edgerton, Harkema, Darrow Panel Discussion

Poor

Outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Samuel Stupp's Potential Supra-Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for John Gensel's Mid-career Crisis of a Spinal Cord Injury Researcher: Can Humanization of Rodent Models through Sex, Age, and Bowel Outcomes Help? Presentation

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Valerie Dietz Fighting for Recovery on Multiple Fronts: The Past, Present, and Future of Clinical Trials for Spinal Cord Injury Presentation

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Jason Biundo's Community Engagement Is Essential for Productive and Meaningful SCI Research Presentation

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Stupp, Gensel, Dietz, Biundo (Session 7)

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

Rating for Advocacy Workshop with Barry Munro, Jason Stoffer, Jake Beckstrom (Workshop A)

Clear selection

Rating for Translational Workshop with Dennis Bourbeau, Michael Lane, Matthew Rodreick and Lana Zholudeva (Workshop B)

poor

outstanding

Clear selection

The presentations stretched my knowledge and engaged me.

Please choose the answer that best describes your reaction.

I found the Question & Answer sessions valuable.

Overall, I found the presentations to be understandable.

Overall, I found the presentations to be encouraging.

My participation in the U2FP Science and Advocacy Symposium has created relationships which would have been unlikely otherwise.

The relationships I build at the U2FP Science and Advocacy Symposium positively influence my personal/professional goals.

Overall, I believe the U2FP Symposium's model of bringing the many stakeholders together with a strong focus on the SCI community is critical to advancing curative therapies for the paralysis community.

I would enthusiastically recommend the U2FP Symposium.

The one or two most positive things I can say about my personal experience of the U2FP Symposium are:

The one or two areas where I believe the U2FP Symposium needs to improve are:

The one or two areas where I believe U2FP needs to improve are:

By entering your name here you give permission for U2FP to use your comments in our publicity:

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside of Unite 2 Fight Paralysis. Report Abuse

Forms