Guidelines for OAR Associate Members
Associate Fellow Member in Open Academic Research is one of the key positions. They bring strong academic and innovation leaderships to the Open Academic Research Group. The guidelines for the membership is enlisted here in this form. Please read the form and accept the guidelines to complete membership application procedure.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Full name *
Contributions
1. Intellectual contribution: At-least two contributions are required from your end per year, these can be lay videos for YouTube-like platform or lay write ups for the websites or book chapters or peer-reviewed journal publications or software development, etc.
Note: The YouTube videos can be in any topics related to academic research or career advice or interviewing someone etc. You may not need to show your face on YouTube if that holds you back.

2. Website: Beside 1, you  must make two updates on the website per year in any of the sections.

3. At least one of the following ways must be used to contribute to OAR workshops:
3.1. Attending the workshop and supervising the creative thinkers
3.2. Fundraising for OAR workshop
3.3. Selection process and pre-organisation OAR workshop
3.4. Editing the OAR annual journal
3.5. Peer-reviewing OAR reports
3.6. Reaching out to creative thinkers by supervising them over internet  

Good practice and unacceptable terms
OAR do not support any form of misconduct in research and commercialisation. All the members are obliged to maintain ethically responsible intellectual work.

You are obliged to discuss and come to an unanimous agreement with other authors of your research papers, proposals, patent rights, licensing, video contents, photography.

You are obliged to be responsible for plagiarism check if you are in a part of a collaboration and a collaborative research output.

Prof Joseph Rotblat has devoted his life for scientific ethics after his involvement in Manhattan project. We strongly follow on of his write up in OAR for our social responsibility.

———
Hippocratic Oath for scientists
By
Joseph Rotblat Sir (1995 Nobel Peace Prize laureate)

The tremendous advances in pure science made during the 20th century have completely changed the relation between science and society. Through its technological applications, science has become a dominant element in our lives. It has enormously improved the quality of life. It has also created great perils, threatening the very existence of the human species. Scientists can no longer claim that their work has nothing to do with the welfare of the individual or with state policies.

However, many scientists still cling to an ivory tower mentality founded on precepts such as “science should be done for its own sake,” “science is neutral,” and “science cannot be blamed for its misapplication.” Their logic rests on the distinction between pure and applied science. It is only the application of science that can be harmful, they allege. As for pure science, they say that the scientist's only obligation is to make the results of research known to the public. What the public does with them is its business, not that of the scientist. This amoral attitude is in my opinion actually immoral, because it eschews personal responsibility for the likely consequences of one's actions.

Nowadays there is much talk about human rights but much less about human responsibilities. The ever-growing interdependence of the world community (largely arising from the applications of science) offers great benefits to individuals, but by the same token it imposes responsibilities on them. Every citizen must be accountable for his or her deeds. This applies particularly to scientists, for the reasons I have outlined. It is also in their own interest, because the public holds scientists responsible for any misuse of science. Even the advocates of a laissez-faire attitude in science must realize the importance of a good public image. The public has the means to control science by withholding the purse or by imposing restrictive regulations. It is far better that scientists themselves take appropriate steps to ensure responsible application of their work.

National academies of science should explicitly include ethical issues in their terms of reference. Such issues must become an integral part of the scientist's ethos. Professional organizations of scientists should work out ethical codes of conduct for their members, including the monitoring of research projects for possible harm to society. It is particularly important to ensure that new entrants into the scientific profession are made aware of their social and moral responsibilities. One way would be to initiate a pledge for scientists, a sort of Hippocratic oath, to be taken at graduation. As in the medical profession, the main value of such an oath might be symbolic, but I believe it would also stimulate young scientists to reflect on the wider consequences of their intended field of work before embarking on a career in academia or industry. This process of reflection would be much enhanced if courses on the ethical aspects of science were introduced into university curricula for science students.

Various formulations of oaths have been proposed, and there is a considerable literature on this. There is no need for a single formulation, however. I like the pledge initiated by the Student Pugwash Group in the United States, which has already been signed by thousands of students from many countries. It reads: “I promise to work for a better world, where science and technology are used in socially responsible ways. I will not use my education for any purpose intended to harm human beings or the environment. Throughout my career, I will consider the ethical implications of my work before I take action. While the demands placed upon me may be great, I sign this declaration because I recognize that individual responsibility is the first step on the path to peace.”
———
Grant and collaboration
You are highly encouraged to apply for international grants and create new collaborations. A Fellow Member, Director, and the Department of Finance and Administration’s approvals are needed prior to submitting a grant, which happens through a productive and visionary discussions. A sufficient time and background should be provided to these individuals and departments.
I agree with the above guidelines to be a new/continued member of OAR organisation. *
Digital signature (name) and place *
A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
This form was created inside of Open Academic Research. Report Abuse