FEEDBACK FROM FACULTY
Note: The University seeks your valuable feedback on the curriculum design/development, teaching-learning process, examination/evaluation, research in your school as well as general infrastructure and governance and your suggestions  for further improvements in our University system. Your responses will be kept confidential. Against each statement a five point scale is given.

The five points are: 5- Strongly Agree (SA), 4- Agree (A), 3- Neutral (N), 2- Disagree (D) and 1-Strongly Disagree (SD). Please choose any one of these options for each statement that best describes your response.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
School *
Name of the Faculty
Employee Code (Optional)
Designation *
Please provide your feedback in the following areas
The five points are: 5- Strongly Agree (SA), 4- Agree (A), 3- Neutral (N), 2- Disagree (D) and 1-Strongly Disagree (SD).
The University encourages participatory decision making by involving employees at various levels *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
Faculty members participate in the designing and developing the course curriculum. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
Faculty members have the freedom to adopt new techniques / strategies of teaching such as group discussions, seminar presentations, etc *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The Board of Studies of the School comprises reputed external members from academia, research institutions and industry. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The examination and evaluation system followed by the University is effective in judging students’ academic performance *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The library is adequately equipped with different learning resources, including books, journals, e-resources etc *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The library is optimally used by the faculty, students and research scholars. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The timings of the library as well as the procedure for issue/return of books in the library are convenient. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The University has taken initiatives to encourage research. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The University supports the participation of faculty in national and international conferences/ seminars/ symposia by providing academic leave and financial support. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
ICT facilities available to the faculty in the University are adequate and satisfactory. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The classrooms and furniture available are adequate, clean and well maintained. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The toilets are sufficient, clean and well maintained. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The labs are adequately equipped for hands-on training of students (if applicable) and research. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
Medical facilities provided by the University are adequate. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The University administration is approachable and faculty-friendly. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The University provides adequate opportunities and support to faculty for their academic growth. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
The University has an effective grievance redressal system. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
Faculty are free to express and share their opinions, ideas and suggestions. *
1
2
3
4
5
Grade
List any one initiative introduced by the University that has significantly contributed towards improvement of your academic/research profile.
Any specific suggestion that you may have for improvement of our University, especially in areas (as per above questions) where you have chosen -Disagree and Strongly Disagree as options.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms