Continuing Excellence - Course Evaluation Form
Course Name: RNR and the Power of Preparation and Motivation for Group-Based Treatment

Date: August 18, 2021

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Apply methods for pre-treatment orientation and preparation for group-based treatment.
2) Describe research related to pre-treatment and motivational approaches in sex abuse specific treatment.
3) Incorporate a client workbook into pre-treatment preparation that invites self-discovery of personal character strengths, (toxic) masculinity and gender stereotypes, cooperation, and receiving and giving help as well as enhancing motivation and openness to treatment change.
4) Apply techniques for facilitating interpersonal interaction in the group for enhanced cohesion and treatment effectiveness.
5) Implement group-based techniques for reducing defensiveness and facilitating social engagement.
6) Describe the application of the risk, need, and responsivity principles to group treatment.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Last Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate) *
First Name (as you'd like printed on your certificate) *
License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)
Issuing state/province, if applicable
Please select which type of Continuing Education certificate of credit you would like. *
I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. *
Required
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? *
5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? *
5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor's knowledge and expertise of the subject (Jerry Jennings) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor's knowledge and expertise of the subject (Steven Sawyer) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor's teaching ability (Jerry Jennings) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor's teaching ability (Steven Sawyer) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #1 *
Learning Objective #1: "Apply methods for pre-treatment orientation and preparation for group-based treatment," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
7.2. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #2 *
Learning Objective #2: "Describe research related to pre-treatment and motivational approaches in sex abuse specific treatment," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
7.3. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #3 *
Learning Objective #3: "Incorporate a client workbook into pre-treatment preparation that invites self-discovery of personal character strengths, (toxic) masculinity and gender stereotypes, cooperation, and receiving and giving help as well as enhancing motivation and openness to treatment change," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
7.4. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #4 *
Learning Objective #4: "Apply techniques for facilitating interpersonal interaction in the group for enhanced cohesion and treatment effectiveness," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
7.5. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #5 *
Learning Objective #5: "Implement group-based techniques for reducing defensiveness and facilitating social engagement," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
7.6. Rate how well the instructors adhered to the learning objective #6 *
Learning Objective #6: "Describe the application of the risk, need, and responsivity principles to group treatment," 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) *
5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process *
5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor's responsiveness to questions (Jerry Jennings) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
13.2. Rate the second instructor's responsiveness to questions (Steven Sawyer) *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
14. Rate the program staff's responsiveness to questions *
5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? *
16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? *
17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? *
18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
PrivacyTerms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms