JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
MultiCiv preferences poll!
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
How many civs do you think would be ideal?
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
Clear selection
Do you think the number of civs should be able to change during the mk?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Do you think there should be a preset maximum number of civs?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Do you think there should be a minimum amount of (active) players for a civ to be player-led?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Do you think there are any government types that should be outright prohibited, that aren’t listed in the community rules? (List as many as you wish)
Your answer
What are the government types you would be excited to try in multiciv and why? (List as many as you wish)
Your answer
Do you think there should be 1 civ guaranteed to be a representative and/or direct democracy of some kind, like in regular dciv?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Should there be an MK-wide constitution like in all previous MKs?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
If in favor of an MK constitution, who should be responsible for enforcing it?
Moderation
An elected depoliticized branch in-game
Abstain
Other:
Who should be responsible for enforcing/judging about local civ laws?
Moderation
An international non-political judiciary
Decided by local law / judicial systems
Abstain
Other:
Should the main Discord server host all civs, or should each civ get their own server (like parties right now)?
Only main server
Main server opt-in
Only separate servers
Abstain
Other:
Should all civs be forced to stream or not?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Should any civs at all be forced to stream (at least 1)?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Should civs be able to close borders to people trying to join them in general?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Should civs be able to close borders to new people?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Should initial citizenship be decided by choice or by random chance?
Choice
Random chance
Abstain
Other:
If you generally support the idea of multiciv for MK7, why?
Your answer
Do you think trying to play a civ competitively and as optimally as possible should be allowed?
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
Do you think military rush / immediate conquest/destruction should be limited or modified in any way by game rules or mutual agreement?
Game Rules
Mutual Agreement
Neither
Abstain
Other:
If yes to the above, how do you feel about allowing civs losing in a war to concede their constitution to the winner instead of losing (some) cities? (The winner civ would be able to dictate the losing civ’s constitution)
Yes
No
Abstain
Other:
If you agree that the game should have overall rules imposed on all civs, what rules/prohibitions do you think there should be besides the ones already mentioned in the poll that would differentiate multiciv from a regular multiplayer civ game?
Your answer
Has the poll missed an questions you would like answered in future polls? Pls list below <3
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report
