JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
SATCON2 Astrophotography Survey
This survey is designed to collect information about the attitudes of astrophotographers toward large satellite constellations ('megaconstellations'), projects intending to launch tens of thousands of new objects into Earth orbit in the coming decade. The information collected will inform the work of the Satellite Constellations 2 (SATCON2) Workshop's Community Engagement Working Group. To learn more about participating in SATCON2, please visit
https://aas.org/satellite-constellations-2-workshop
.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
In which country do you make most of your astrophotographs?
Choose
United States (USA)
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territories
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
What is the nature of your astrophotography work? (check all that apply)
*
Amateur/hobbyist
Professional/semi-professional/commercial
Academic/university
Citizen scientist
Other:
Required
What kinds of astrophotography do you engage in? (check all that apply)
*
Wide-field, landscapes/nightscapes
Telephoto/Telescopic, planetary
Telephoto/Telescopic, deep-sky/deepscapes
Other:
Required
How significant are the impacts of artificial objects, including satellites and space debris, to your astrophotography currently?
*
Zero (there has been no noticeable effect)
Minimal (these objects affect my images at the lowest possible level)
Moderate (these objects affect my images in a way that is annoying but tolerable)
Significant (these objects hinder my astrophotography in an important way)
Severe (these objects inhibit my astrophotography work entirely)
What types of your astrophotos are most affected by artificial objects? (check all that apply)
*
Milky Way
Star trails
Constellations
Panoramas
Tracked/stacked blends
Moon images
Meteor showers
Other:
Required
Compared to five years ago, are those impacts more or less?
*
More
Less
If you answered "More" to the previous question, can you estimate the fraction? (e.g., 10%, 20%, 50%, etc.)
Your answer
What sort of burden is imposed by removal of moving object effects in the post processing of your images?
*
None
Minimal (subject to automated removal in software)
Moderate (subject to extensive manual removal in software)
Significant (some images are unusable/objects cannot be removed)
Severe (most or all images are unusable/objects cannot be removed)
Prior to the first SpaceX Starlink launch in May 2019 there were about 4,000 functional objects such as satellites orbiting the Earth. SpaceX has already launched about 1,800 satellites. The total number of new objects launched in this decade may reach up to 100,000. Do you think there is a ‘break point’ at which the number of objects orbiting the Earth will irreparably harm your astrophotography?
*
Yes
No
Not sure/don't know
If yes, would you care to venture a guess as to the size of that number?
Your answer
Please provide any comments/suggestions you have regarding large satellite constellations, including additional information you would like to receive, ideas for mitigating effects, etc.
Your answer
If you are willing to contribute additional thoughts/information to this project, please provide your e-mail address. This information is not required, and will not be shared outside of this study.
Your answer
Submit
Page 1 of 1
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms