Quiz 2 - Overview of Modern SNARK Constructions

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Make sure you carefully put a single email address in the Email field that matches the email address you put in the signup form. Otherwise, you will not be graded for this quiz.

Email *

How are SNARKs different from IPs? *

1 point

SNARKs are arguments and not proofs, i.e., they only provide computational soundness

All SNARKs have sublinear proof size

All SNARKs have linear provers

All SNARKs have sublinear verifier

All SNARKs prove NP statements

SNARKs are non-interactive

SNARKs are knowledge-sound

Required

Which of the following are true about preprocessing SNARKs? *

1 point

Preprocessing is required to speed up SNARK prover

We can not construct SNARKs for general circuits without preprocessing

If the secrets used in the trusted setup are revealed, the SNARK prover can violate soundness

SNARKs with transparent setup can not be made zero-knowledge since the setup can not have secrets

Required

Which of the following are true about the components used to construct SNARKs? *

1 point

Functional commitment schemes are SNARKs that support a restricted class of functions

An unbounded prover can't break the knowledge soundness of an Interactive oracle proof (IOP)

SNARKs can only be made from IOPs that use efficiently-realizable oracles because the verifier has to query these oracles

Functional commitments are used to instantiate the oracles in IOPs

To make a SNARK zero-knowledge, we use a hiding functional commitment scheme

Required

Which of the following are true about the SNARK for polynomial equality testing? *

1 point

The oracles in the corresponding IOP have a degree bound to ensure that the oracle is efficiently realizable

The oracles in the corresponding IOP have a degree bound to ensure that any inconsistencies in the input polynomials are detected

The corresponding IOP can be made non-interactive using the Fiat-Shamir transform because it is public-coin

We can replace the polynomial commitment with a vector commitment that commits to all evaluations of the polynomial to construct this SNARK, albeit at a performance penalty

Required

Send me a copy of my responses.

Submit

Clear form

reCAPTCHA

Privacy Terms

This form was created inside of UC Berkeley. Report Abuse

Forms