Relational Theory Clinical Practice Evaluation Form
Evaluation forms are an essential component of our Continuing Education programming and approval and are a much appreciated part of our program review process. All participants are asked to complete evaluation forms. For the narrative questions, if a question does not apply, please type in NA. Your responses are anonymous and your emails are not tracked. The email accounts are used simply to ensure that you do not complete this form more than one time; however, you will be able to return to the form at any time to edit your responses. We greatly appreciate your help in improving our programs. If you have any questions, email the center administrator, Charla Malamed, at mrcinfo@mitchellrelationalcenter.org.
Program *
Semester *
Required
Sessions 11 & 12: Winnicott and Contemporary Perspectives on the Object, Slochower *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
How well did this module introduce you to the early beginnings of Relational psychoanalysis and psychotherapy?
Did the instructor facilitate the development of group cohesion?
I can describe Winnicott's understanding of the therapeutic function of the holding environment and regression to dependence
I understand how the relational perspective re-shapes our understanding of the holding metaphor
I understand the move from object relating to object usage in Winnicott's thinking and its relationship to the relational turn
Sessions 13 & 14: Intersubjectivity, Jessica Benjamin *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I have learned how to apply the concepts of intersubjectivity regarding enactment and dissociation to my clinical practice
I have learned how to work with building the Third in the analytic space.
Sessions 15 & 27: Transference & Countertransference, Tony Bass *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I am able to identify and compare different ways of using themselves in the therapeutic situation, involving direct and indirect uses of countertransference.
I am able to describe and identify a variety of ways of gaining access to and making use of their countertransference to benefit psychotherapeutic work with difficult, disturbing and/or challenging patients.
Session 16: Transference & Countertransference, Lisa Lyons *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This class helped me to feel more comfortable identifying and making clinical use of my erotic feelings towards a patient.
Session 17 & 18: Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma, Sue Grand *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
Session 19: Integration of Material, Lisa Lyons *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I better understand the statement, paraphrased from Mitchell, that the clinician has to get into the transference before you can get out of it
Sessions 20 & 21: Interpersonal Psychoanalysis, Margaret Black *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This module gave me a clear understanding of the history of the introduction of relational psychoanalysis
After participating in the entire module I am better able to identify some of the ways a relational approach can engage the patient in an emotionally deeper clinical process.
Sessions 22 & 23: The Relational perspective on working with multi-problem and self-injuring individuals, Lisa Lyons *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This class helped me to identify some of the early origins of pateints’ pre-occupation with suicide.
This class helped me to understand the limits of using interpretation with multi-problem patients.
Session 24: Glenys Lobban *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
Session 25 & 26: Working in Community Settings, Rossanna Echegoyén *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
I understand the relational concepts of self-disclosure, intersubjectivity, mutuality (mutual recognition) as it relates to community practice.
I'm able to apply relational concepts and conceptualize case examples/clinical work in community settings.
I understand the purpose and rationale to explore and use my subjectivity as an analyst or therapist in community practice as it relates to marginalized populations, with a focus on racial/cultural/ethnic/political/gendered positions in the transference/countertransference.
Session 28: Wrap-up, Lisa Lyons *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
How would you rate this module overall?
How would you rate the quality and interest of presentations?
How would you rate the quality and interest of discussion?
How would you rate the overall effectiveness and expertise of the instructor?
How would you rate the instructor's facilitation of group cohesion/dynamics and conversation?
This class helped me to consider the complexity, important limitations , and value of self-disclosure in clinical work.
OVERALL LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR FALL SEMESTER *
Overall Satisfaction. Please check the box that applies:
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
Excellent
After completing the fall semester, I can describe, compare, and contrast the essential contributions of the theorists whose work has been covered so far.
After completing the fall semester, I have a deeper understanding of the historical course of the theoretical debates that have culminated in the development of Relational Psychoanalysis.
After completing the fall semester, I can evaluate and assess for myself which theoretical models are more compatible with my own thinking and the usefulness of these ideas for contemporary clinical work.
What, for you, was the highlight of this program? *
If you were to change anything about the program, what would it be?   *
What was most effective? *
What was least effective? *
What is your overall impression of the technological aspects of virtual Zoom setup and experience? *
What is your overall impression of the registration process? *
If you participated in a seminar that included those who attended remotely, what was your experience of that? *
Are there any other comments you would like to share with us? *
Would you recommend this seminar to a friend / colleague? *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms