Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither
Agree
Strongly Agree
NA/Don't Know
Check-in: The table was easy to find and it was a straightforward process
Check-in: I felt that I had all the logistical information I needed after check-in
Venue: I was able to easily find a space to set up home base
Venue: I would set up home base in the same space next year
Venue: My team was easily able to find their events
Venue: High quality food was available on and off campus
Events: I felt that the lab events were run well (i.e. fair/suitable space/safe)
Events: I felt that the build/engineering events were run well (i.e. efficient/fair/ES was communicative)
Events: I felt that the written events were run well (i.e. fair, efficient, timely)
Events: For quality assurance, please mark "Disagree" for this question
Events: I felt that the written events were too difficult
Events: ESUS was straightforward and easy to do
Awards: The awards ceremony started at a reasonable time
Awards: The awards ceremony ended at a reasonable time
Communication: Leading up to the event, I felt supported by the tournament staff in preparing for the tournament
Communication: I knew who to contact if I had a question
General: Important tournament documents were easy to find and access
General: Public resources listed on our webpage were helpful to prepare for the tournament
General: I would come back to the Science Olympiad next year if it was run the same way.
General: I would recommend Science Olympiad to a friend or colleague.
