Subject: Engineering Graphics& Design
In order to instill transparency, integrate positive approach, and incorporating scope of continuous improvement, the University is introducing a well conceived methodology to get students' feedback on the performance of the Faculty.
Rating questions: Scale for rating 1-> Needs Improvement 2-> Average 3-> Good 4-> Very Good 5-> Excellent
Teacher *
Subject Matter *
1
2
3
4
5
Was the course planned?
Was the course coverage adequate?
Did the topic provide new knowledge?
Teaching Learning Process *
1
2
3
4
5
Were you able to understand the contents in class?
Was the interaction in class adequate?
Were you stais fied with teaching style?
Use of Learning Resources *
1
2
3
4
5
Was the board used effectively?
Were the projection aids employed effectively?
Did the overall use of learning resources enhanced your understanding?
Evaluation Process *
1
2
3
4
5
Were adequate assignments / tutorial sheet given?
Were the assignment and class test challenging?
Were the same checked properly within seven working days
Was the evaluation fair and cleared your doubts?
General Points *
1
2
3
4
5
Did the teacher meet your expectations?
Were you satisfied with the course in general
Would you like to take another course from the same teacher?
提交
清除表单内容
此内容不是由 Google 所创建，Google 不对其作任何担保。 举报滥用行为 - 服务条款 - 隐私权政策
Google 表单