Points of reference for videographic criticism

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

This is a version of the poll I shared during the closing roundtable for the symposium 'Interrogating the Modes of Videographic Criticism': https://cc.au.dk/poetics-of-videographic-criticism/interrogating-the-modes-of-videographic-criticism

Because tech issues meant some participants couldn't respond, I thought it would be interesting/fun to invite further responses. The topics in the first question were (mainly) suggested to me by discussions during the symposium.

Thanks for participating!
- Alan O'Leary

For me, points of reference for videographic criticism should include: *

Cinephilia and 'retrospectatorship'

Documentary

Modernist literature and art (eg., Pataphysics, Surrealism, Oulipo)

The ‘traditional’ standards and protocols of prose scholarship

Psychoanalysis

Experimental video

Environmental imperatives (and/or environmental humanities)

Movements for social justice

Themes and questions in mainstream screen studies

Anthropology and ethnographic film

Practice(-led) research and artistic research

Critical and speculative design

Other:

Required

In my opinion, *

the above list is far too narrow

the above list is far too broad

Sorry, but I refuse to participate any further in this tendentious exercise!

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Forms