JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Evaluation Popular Scientific Writing, Nov.-Dec. '22 - RUG | FEB
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
1.
What did you think of the part about
Setting the scene
–
critical choices for authors
and storytelling
(
Phase 1)?
*
Very good
Good
Sufficient
Not sufficient
Very unsatisfactory
Required
1a. Remarks:
Your answer
2.
How do you rate the part about S
ettin
g up
a draft:
structural elements
and the use of arguments
(Phase 2)?
*
Very good
Good
Sufficient
Not sufficient
Very unsatisfactory
Required
2a. Remarks:
Your answer
3.
What did you think of
Phase
3: writing
a
(rough
) draft
?
*
Very good
Good
Sufficient
Not sufficient
Very unsatisfactory
Required
3a. Remarks:
Your answer
4.
What did you think of the part about
Polishing up
–
support material and attractive language
(Phase 4)?
*
Very good
Good
Sufficient
Not sufficient
Very unsatisfactory
Required
4a. Remarks:
Your answer
5. How do you rate Phase 5:
Finishing up
–
editorial
work
?
*
Very good
Good
Sufficient
Not sufficient
Very unsatisfactory
Required
5a. Remarks:
Your answer
6. Did the programme meet your expectations?
*
Yes, because (see below)
No, because (see below)
6a. Commentary:
Your answer
7. What feedback would you give to the trainer, Steven Flipse?
*
Your answer
8. Please grade the programme using a mark (from 1 to 10; 1 being the worst evaluation, 10 the best)
*
Your answer
9. Do you have any other remarks about the programme?
Your answer
Submit
Page 1 of 1
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
